I've seen two choices in the 2" sight tube/Cheshire combo market -- the Lightpipe and the Catseye.
Anyone have a preference for one or the other?
I've seen two choices in the 2" sight tube/Cheshire combo market -- the Lightpipe and the Catseye.
Anyone have a preference for one or the other?
Fly me to the moon, let me play among the stars -- Sinatra
Older Discovery 12.5 solid tube dob, Orion 120mm refractor, non-go-to mount, eyepieces are 40mm and 32mm Orion Highlights, 25mm and 10mm Orion stock, 17mm Sterling, 12.5mm Baader, and 7.5mm Orion Ultrascopic, all housed in 8X10 Sky Shed
Catseye is renowned for being the most precise collimating tool. I myself use Cheshire - because of my Bird-Jones Celestron.
rwsandy (12-08-2010)
i agree with rwsandy
Fly me to the moon, let me play among the stars -- Sinatra
Older Discovery 12.5 solid tube dob, Orion 120mm refractor, non-go-to mount, eyepieces are 40mm and 32mm Orion Highlights, 25mm and 10mm Orion stock, 17mm Sterling, 12.5mm Baader, and 7.5mm Orion Ultrascopic, all housed in 8X10 Sky Shed
I will probably go with the Catseye, but here's another question:
The combination sight tube/Cheshire is less expensive than buying a sight tube and also buying a separate Cheshire. Is there any really, really good reason to buy these tools as separate items?
Fly me to the moon, let me play among the stars -- Sinatra
Older Discovery 12.5 solid tube dob, Orion 120mm refractor, non-go-to mount, eyepieces are 40mm and 32mm Orion Highlights, 25mm and 10mm Orion stock, 17mm Sterling, 12.5mm Baader, and 7.5mm Orion Ultrascopic, all housed in 8X10 Sky Shed
Another to look at would be the Hotech 2" laser collimator...That, and a 2" collimation cap and you're set.
Allen
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 5 or greater. You currently have 0 signatures.
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 5 or greater. You currently have 0 signatures.
XT8 Classic/Baader Hyperion 24mm and 13mm EP's
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 5 or greater. You currently have 0 signatures.
Member, KADIAN
Member, Big Country Astronomy Club
Joe Lalumia (12-10-2010),rwsandy (12-10-2010)
I would not think so. As for a laser collimator - sources say that it is possible to adjust primary with the secondary noticeably askew in the way that the beam returns to bullseye. Do not know if it's true - I just prefer seeing and understanding rather than doing anything automatically. Laser is also useless with my Bird-Jones (what a chore!).
rwsandy (12-10-2010)
Fly me to the moon, let me play among the stars -- Sinatra
Older Discovery 12.5 solid tube dob, Orion 120mm refractor, non-go-to mount, eyepieces are 40mm and 32mm Orion Highlights, 25mm and 10mm Orion stock, 17mm Sterling, 12.5mm Baader, and 7.5mm Orion Ultrascopic, all housed in 8X10 Sky Shed
To be honest, I'm looking for one myself...but I've used one at a local star party.
If someone would be so kind as to mention brand that would be great.
Allen
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 5 or greater. You currently have 0 signatures.
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 5 or greater. You currently have 0 signatures.
XT8 Classic/Baader Hyperion 24mm and 13mm EP's
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 5 or greater. You currently have 0 signatures.
Member, KADIAN
Member, Big Country Astronomy Club
rwsandy (12-10-2010)
Actually, since an autocollimator has a center hole, I wonder if it could serve double duty as a basic collimation cap? I don't own one, so I don't know.
Fly me to the moon, let me play among the stars -- Sinatra
Older Discovery 12.5 solid tube dob, Orion 120mm refractor, non-go-to mount, eyepieces are 40mm and 32mm Orion Highlights, 25mm and 10mm Orion stock, 17mm Sterling, 12.5mm Baader, and 7.5mm Orion Ultrascopic, all housed in 8X10 Sky Shed