Results 1 to 4 of 4
  1. #1
    kk23wong's Avatar
    kk23wong is offline White Dwarf
    Points: 6,914, Level: 57
    Level completed: 82%, Points required for next Level: 36
    Overall activity: 0%
    Achievements:
    First 1000 Experience Points365 Days+ Registered Achievement!750 Days+ Registered Achievement!2 Posts Achievement1000 Days+ Registered Achievement!
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    Hong Kong, CN
    Posts
    4
    Points
    6,914
    Level
    57
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post

    Default Applying Biological Concepts into Planets



    There are common characteristics among living things. By comparing them with the Earth, we will have a more concrete idea on how the eco-system (the life-cycles inside the planet) works. Thus, we can use the biological concepts (which can be applied on the Earth) as a solid ground to find out the validity of my hypothesis, ‘Planets are living things”. The similarities among living things are the clues to the live symptoms of the planets themselves. I have mentioned before that the planets themselves are alive, although their forms of existences and life expectancies are different from the living organisms inside. In fact, the forms of existences vary among living things.

    Other planets in the solar system (in which, they can be reached and observed) are being adopted as the “control experiments” of the Earth. The cross-references in-between the Earth and other planet (i.e. the Mars) will definitely contribute to breakthroughs in our cosmology. This research will help us to find out the guiding principles of the mechanism in our universe. The ages of the planets are obstacles in the comparisons. The process of aging is an inevitable result of every planet. The key elements are the ages of these planets. The end of the “life-cycles” of the planets resulted in the extinctions of the planet without any live symptom. The inter-exchanges of the chemical particles inside a planet are almost invisible in these planets (in which, their life-cycles have come to an end) because of their “ages”. Thus, the symptoms of lives and evidences of civilizations have been demolished by unknown causes before or after their life-cycles have come to an end. The ages of the planets are speculations only.

    To begin with, I am going to put the focus on evaluating the Earth with biological theories first in order to find out the similarities in-between the Earth and other living things. The applications of the biological theories on the Earth (e.g. reproduction, “life cycles” – growth and aging) are essential. Reviews on other scientific researches (including those under-developing theories) are necessary and essential. My hypothesis comes across various scientific subjects. Due to my limitations in the professionals for all of them, reviews on existing scientific theories are essential. I am taking up this research as a lifetime project because it is worthy. The “Definitions of Living Things” as I mentioned in my previous article are diversified in sciences and the proofs of my hypothesis are closely associated with them. The hypothesis “Lives at different levels” is different from the “evolution of species”. The planets are conscious objects. In which, she (the “God”) is thinking in a unity. The forms of presences take the lead in my hypothesis.

    First, the “reconstruction” of the definitions of living things is my first approach. Plants (natural vegetations) acts like the organs inside the our bodies. Definitions of living things have to be modified. Two branches come in the first place during the classification of species: (1) Animals and Insects; (2) Plants. Under my hypothesis, the Earth is a living object. Plants are responsible for the interchanges of chemicals inside her body. They carried out the processes of “photosynthesis” which are necessary for her “life-cycles”. In which, their functions are necessary for maintaining the “life-cycles” of the Earth. They are not conscious. However, “animals and insects” are her OFFSPRING. They are conscious. Therefore, only “animals and plants” can be classified as ‘living things”. Hence, the definitions of the living things have been changed. Plants are not conscious and cannot be defined as “living things”. They are only organs inside a planet, but the planet itself is CONCIOUS. The questions of consciousness have to be the first criteria for the definitions of living things. “Animals and insects” are the offspring of the planet. All of them are conscious. Plants are not conscious because they are only the organs of the Earth. If the Earth is conscious, consciousness will become the ONLY definition of living things.

    Second, the application of the “evolution” is another approach. The combination of the theories of “evolution” will definitely help to explain the diversification of the offspring of the planet. The Earth is the candle as well as the origin of lives. The planets themselves have “life-cycles” which may be accompanied with the evolutions of their offspring. It is the first attempt to illustrate my hypothesis. The complexity of lives may have cohesions and even in the same progress of the “life-cycles” of our Earth. The simplicity of lives from the beginning and gradually turned out to become more complex forms of lives throughout the time. The extinctions of all species are the end of the “life-cycles” of the planets. The diversification of species in the beginning and it gradually turned into extinctions of all species. Our civilizations are the major triggers for the acceleration of the process of extinctions of species. Thus, it has resulted in the chain effects of extinctions of species and destroyed the “life-cycles” inside the planet. The cohesiveness in-between the “evolutions and extinctions of species” and the “live-cycles” of the planet need further researches. Under my hypothesis, planets carry out reproductions inside their bodies. To be more specific, the “evolution and extinction of species” may act as both the “life-cycles” and “reproductions” of the Earth. In the meantime, it proves the Earth has undergone a process of growth. She “grows” from simplicity into complex forms of lives. This approach aims at improving my hypothesis. Evolution is a process of “growth” of the Earth. It is a continuous process in her “life-cycles”.

    I am going to develop my hypothesis in the directions above.

    Teru Wong
    Use Smartphone to Find More Information on My Image

  2. #2
    WWPierre's Avatar
    WWPierre is offline HYPER GIANT
    Points: 64,445, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 0%
    Achievements:
    10 Days registered3 Years + Achievement400+ Posts AchievementGhost Achievement! Averaging 5+ posts a day!1000 Days+ Registered Achievement!
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    Squamish B.C.
    Posts
    6,948
    Points
    64,445
    Level
    100
    Thanks
    1,095
    Thanked 2,953x 1,808 Posts

    Default

    Welcome to our forum, Mr Wong.

    Have you studied Lovelock?

    Gaia hypothesis - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
    Meade 16" LightBridge; Celestron G-8N Bird-Jones/motorized EQ5;
    To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 5 or greater. You currently have 0 signatures.
    127 Mak/go-to EQ5; Burgess 127f8 refractor; Sky-Watcher 5" F/5 collapsible dob; 90mm Mak/motorized EQ2; Royal Astro 76/910-GEM; Meade 60x700 refractor/alt/az; Zhumell 25x100 Coin Ops; GalilleoScope. Celestron 8mm-24mm zoom; lots of fixed EPs,some good, some..not so much. A small collection of surveying instruments; a forest of tripods; Canon Rebel Xti. Confirmed gadget junkie; Custodian of the Magnetic North Pole (Send $1.00 to Pierre each time you use a compass.)
    49-41-37.03N 123-09-29.61W Calculated magnetic declination: 17° 39' East

    To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 5 or greater. You currently have 0 signatures.


    To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 5 or greater. You currently have 0 signatures.


    To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 5 or greater. You currently have 0 signatures.

    We have been broadcasting our presence to the Universe for 100 years now. If there is a detachment of Galactic Pest Control within 100 light years, they are already on the way.

  3. #3
    kk23wong's Avatar
    kk23wong is offline White Dwarf
    Points: 6,914, Level: 57
    Level completed: 82%, Points required for next Level: 36
    Overall activity: 0%
    Achievements:
    First 1000 Experience Points365 Days+ Registered Achievement!750 Days+ Registered Achievement!2 Posts Achievement1000 Days+ Registered Achievement!
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    Hong Kong, CN
    Posts
    4
    Points
    6,914
    Level
    57
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post

    Default RE: Applying Biological Concepts into Planets

    Thank you very much for your reply.

    My hypothesis is completely different from Gaia hypothesis.

    My argument lies on the consciousness of the Earth. In which, it will definitely changed the definitions of living thing. Consciousness will be the only way to define living objects.

    The plants are non-living because they are not conscious. They are enabled to growth and diversified into species because they are the “organic” or “living” tissues inside the Earth. They are not conscious at all.

    Animals and insects are conscious. We are the offspring of the Earth.
    The process of reproductions of the Earth is carried out inside “her” body.

    Biologically, she is our mother on the Earth. (It related to the formations of religions.) Science cannot be the valid without the existence of the God. (It is a sensitive issue. In which, I will elaborate more after my scientific proof of my hypothesis, “Planets are living objects”.

    I have no doubts that it is the greatest discoveries in history and I am currently working on its proof.

    Teru Wong
    Use Smartphone to Find More Information on My Image

  4. #4
    kk23wong's Avatar
    kk23wong is offline White Dwarf
    Points: 6,914, Level: 57
    Level completed: 82%, Points required for next Level: 36
    Overall activity: 0%
    Achievements:
    First 1000 Experience Points365 Days+ Registered Achievement!750 Days+ Registered Achievement!2 Posts Achievement1000 Days+ Registered Achievement!
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    Hong Kong, CN
    Posts
    4
    Points
    6,914
    Level
    57
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post

    Default

    Below are the supplementary.

    Definitions of lives have to be rewritten, if we define planets as conscious living objects.

    Plants are living tissues of the planets. Microorganisms are the same. When the "life cycles" of the planets still running (which means it still alive), the planets are full of living tissues and microorganisms. They are similar to our "body cells". They will not exist after the planets are dead, like the Mars.

    Living things must have a brain-like structure inside their body. Animals have it, so they are the offspring of the Earth. Microorganisms cannot regenerate in the space and after the life cycles of the planets end.

    There are life expectancies of every planet. The activities of the offspring will be resulted in the changes in the speed of life cycles of the planets.

    Space migrations are impossible because the life cycles of the planets nearby have come to an end. Unless we have a very powerful engines that can enable us to reach other planets which still alive.

    Besides, these planets nearby (even it still alive) are conscious living objects. You can land on it, but they are conscious.

    Teru Wong
    Use Smartphone to Find More Information on My Image

 

 

Similar Threads

  1. we discuss about the basic science concepts...
    By lisa in forum Amateur Astronomy Forum
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 02-09-2008, 06:38 AM
  2. some biological eligible books will yet happen the winners
    By Jonas in forum Amateur Astronomy Forum
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 12-29-2007, 09:47 PM
  3. Seeking help with a few complex concepts...
    By Droogan in forum General Astronomy Forum
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 11-09-2004, 08:22 AM
  4. TOE - Possible Breakthrough Concepts
    By Yoda in forum General Astronomy Forum
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 04-14-2004, 06:54 AM
  5. Another biological explanation of the Mars spherules.
    By Robert Clark in forum General Astronomy Forum
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 03-05-2004, 04:13 PM

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.2.0
Powered by vBulletin®
All times are GMT. The time now is 10:44 AM.