Results 1 to 4 of 4
Like Tree3Likes
  • 1 Post By KathyNS
  • 1 Post By KT4HX
  • 1 Post By Ozman13

Thread: Moon Vs Light pollution - A question

  1. #1
    MG1692's Avatar
    MG1692 is offline HYPER GIANT
    Points: 12,974, Level: 78
    Level completed: 64%, Points required for next Level: 126
    Overall activity: 0%
    Achievements:
    2 Posts Achievement20 Posts Achievement!50 Posts Achievement!200+ Posts Achievement!400+ Posts Achievement
    Join Date
    Sep 2014
    Location
    Kansas
    Posts
    2,812
    Points
    12,974
    Level
    78
    Thanks
    26
    Thanked 1,280x 844 Posts

    Default Moon Vs Light pollution - A question



    I have reasonably easy access to a dark sky site - By way of comparison I live in red- orange. But observe in gray at my dark site.

    My question is - what is the trade off for say first quarter moon compared to artificial light pollution. I am thinking open clusters may be a more interesting target to observe from a dark sky site with Moon interference, than in an orange-red zone.

    Is my thinking flawed, or is it something that would give me a bit of advantage?
    Nexstar SE8 mount with Farstar C8 OTA (Caroline) Meade Series 5000 HD-60 25mm Paradigm Dual ED 25mm 18mm 15mm, Baader 21mm 17mm plus tunning rings, X-Cel LX 2X Barlow, various other bits and bob.

  2. #2
    KathyNS's Avatar
    KathyNS is offline Super Moderator
    Points: 170,856, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 35.0%
    Achievements:
    200+ Posts Achievement!Ghost Achievement! Averaging 5+ posts a day!First 1000 Experience Points400+ Posts AchievementGot three Friends
    Awards:
    Activity & Post & Thread Master
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Location
    Nova Scotia
    Posts
    24,974
    Points
    170,856
    Level
    100
    Thanks
    6,625
    Thanked 14,910x 9,490 Posts
    Blog Entries
    3

    Default Re: Moon Vs Light pollution - A question

    Moonlight is a lot like light pollution. Open clusters are always a good bet when you have LP from any source and you want to observe anyway. Even globular clusters are not bad. It's the really fuzzy stuff that gets washed out by the Moon.
    jaetea likes this.

    To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 5 or greater. You currently have 0 signatures.


    DSO AP: Orion 200mm f/4 Newtonian Astrograph; ATIK 383L+; EFW2 filter wheel; Astrodon Ha,LRGB filters; KWIQ/QHY5 guide scope; Planetary AP: Celestron C-11; ZWO ASI120MC; Portable: Celestron C-8 on HEQ5 pro; C-90 on wedge; 20x80 binos; Etc: Canon 350D; Various EPs, etc. Obs: 8' Exploradome; iOptron CEM60 (pier);
    To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 5 or greater. You currently have 0 signatures.
    .

    To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 5 or greater. You currently have 0 signatures.

  3. #3
    KT4HX's Avatar
    KT4HX is offline HYPER GIANT
    Points: 98,792, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 47.0%
    Achievements:
    365 Days+ Registered Achievement!First 1000 Experience Points750 Days+ Registered Achievement!1000 Days+ Registered Achievement!200+ Posts Achievement!
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Virginia
    Posts
    11,689
    Points
    98,792
    Level
    100
    Thanks
    1,381
    Thanked 7,991x 4,313 Posts
    Blog Entries
    200

    Default Re: Moon Vs Light pollution - A question

    From my experience dealing with the moon at both dark sites and under LP, the impact of the moon is more pronounced at dark sites. That stands to reason, because in typical locations the sky is already bright. The impact at the dark site definitely does depend upon the amount of illumination of the moon's surface and also its position in the sky. If it is nearer to a horizon then observing in the opposite direction can be helpful. I can tell you from experience at my dark site, which is typically SQM-L 21.2 to 21.5, that the first quarter moon can have a lot of impact. But again, choosing your objects wisely can help make the session more successful. Open clusters and asterims are always better choices. Globulars can also be viewed, but you will also lose some of the outer portions. Some high surface brightness planetary nebulae can also weather the moon better. But as Keith said, diffuse nebulae and galaxies really get hammered by the increased sky brightness. Bottom line is it is doable, but not preferable to observing when the moon is out of the way.
    bladekeeper likes this.
    Alan || My DSO Blog:
    To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 5 or greater. You currently have 0 signatures.

    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Astro Sky 17.5 f/4.5 Dob || Apertura AD12 f/5 Dob || Zhumell Z10 f/4.9 Dob
    ES AR127 f/6.5 and ES ED80 f/6 on Twilight-II Mount
    ES 82° 24mm thru 4.7mm
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Astronomers: We look into the past to see our future.

  4. #4
    Ozman13's Avatar
    Ozman13 is offline HYPER GIANT
    Points: 27,294, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 17.0%
    Achievements:
    2 Posts Achievement5 Threads Achievement!20 Posts Achievement!365 Days+ Registered Achievement!50 Posts Achievement!
    Join Date
    Jun 2013
    Location
    Hopkinsville Kentucky
    Posts
    7,879
    Points
    27,294
    Level
    100
    Thanks
    162
    Thanked 2,107x 1,887 Posts

    Default Re: Moon Vs Light pollution - A question

    There is a drastic difference between viewing at my home in town and at my dark site 25 miles NW of town. If the moon is more than a quarter full, I hesitate to make the trip. If the moon is more than half full, I don't even consider it, I might as well stay in my driveway and observe what I can.
    jaetea likes this.

    To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 5 or greater. You currently have 0 signatures.
    ACF 8"SCT,
    To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 5 or greater. You currently have 0 signatures.

    To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 5 or greater. You currently have 0 signatures.
    , Celestron C6A SCT,
    To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 5 or greater. You currently have 0 signatures.
    120, ES 102CF Apo triplet, ES AR102, ST100, ST90, Apex 90mm Mak, ST80, ETX60, Oberwerk 25x100s, 15x70s, 8x56s, Kasai 2.3x40s, Celestron AVX, CG4, SLT, LCM, Obie HD Parallel Bino mount, Canon T5, Meade DSI2 Pro, Phillips cam, Explore Scientific 30mm, 24mm, 18mm, 14mm, 11mm, 8.8mm, 6.7mm 82 degree EPs, ES 24mm, 20mm, 16mm 68 degree EPs, Baader 9mm Ortho, Meade 5000 SWA EP set, many more various EPs, Baader Moon&SkyGlow, FringeKiller, SemiApo filters, Celestron UHC, Meade 4000 Nebular Filter, Kson OIII, DGM NPB and lots of astro stuff.

 

 

Similar Threads

  1. light pollution map question
    By rockey.f.squirrell in forum Astronomy Beginners Forum
    Replies: 13
    Last Post: 09-30-2016, 12:35 AM
  2. Question about light pollution
    By Hubbs1 in forum Astronomy Beginners Forum
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 10-08-2015, 07:13 PM
  3. Suburban AP and Light Pollution Question
    By sagramore in forum Astronomy Beginners Forum
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 03-10-2015, 08:22 PM
  4. light pollution question
    By smoreau in forum Astronomy Beginners Forum
    Replies: 13
    Last Post: 08-01-2011, 09:55 PM
  5. light pollution question.....
    By frontman9000 in forum Telescope Forums
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 10-25-2009, 02:51 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.2.0
Powered by vBulletin®
All times are GMT. The time now is 10:41 AM.