Results 1 to 5 of 5
  1. #1
    Jeff Hammersmark's Avatar
    Jeff Hammersmark Guest

    Default Galaxies and spiral arms



    Please, oh please don't take this as anything more than a passing thought.
    I'm sure there's a major flaw in this suggestion that someone will point out
    and that's in part why I'm putting the idea out there.

    Light travels at a finite speed. When we look at a galaxy, we are seeing it
    at many different points in time, as the part of the galaxy that is closest
    to us can be millions of light years closer than the far end, thus the light
    from the far end takes millions more years to reach us. Basically what I am
    saying is, in *some* cases, could the reason that some galaxies appear to
    have spiral arms be because they are rotating, and the length of the arm is
    thousands of light years long, therefore the closest part will appear
    farthest in the direction of rotation and the farther back the arm you go,
    the farther back in time you go causing it to look like a spiral arm?

    Whew....I hope somebody understands that.....

    - Jeff
    http://www.planetary.org
    $30 a year and you're part of the team sending the first solar sail into
    space......



  2. #2
    Jonathan Silverlight's Avatar
    Jonathan Silverlight Guest

    Default Galaxies and spiral arms

    In message <yzD5d.158175$XP3.131357@edtnps84>, Jeff Hammersmark
    <jdhammer@telus.net> writes

    No, because we see galaxies face on and they show spiral arms - that's
    when they are best seen.
    Galaxies are a few thousand (not million) light years across.
    Spiral arms are an illusion in the sense that they aren't permanent
    things that go round a galaxy, but they aren't that sort of illusion.
    --
    What have they got to hide? Release the ESA Beagle 2 report.
    Remove spam and invalid from address to reply.

  3. #3
    Jeff Hammersmark's Avatar
    Jeff Hammersmark Guest

    Default Galaxies and spiral arms

    I realize that spiral arms really do exist and I know that galxies that we
    see face on prove it, I was just thinking of a situation where it isn't face
    on - more at an angle. Could this situation create an illusion of spiral
    arms or a spiral pattern which isn't actually there? Also, galaxies are of
    course not millions of light years across (I guess I was confusing that with
    light years away) but if you want to get technical, they are usually more
    than just a few thousand light years across - Tens to hundreds of thousands
    would probably be a more accurate description of their sizes.
    "Jonathan Silverlight" <jsilverlight@spam.merseia.fsnet.co.uk.invalid> wrote
    in message news:fG6XytBJ6wVBFwUM@merseia.fsnet.co.uk...



  4. #4
    Odysseus's Avatar
    Odysseus Guest

    Default Galaxies and spiral arms

    Jeff Hammersmark wrote:
    For features to change their apparent shape because of the time-lag
    between the arrival of the light from the 'foreground' parts of the
    galaxy and the 'background', they'd have to be moving extremely fast
    -- a substantial fraction of c -- which doesn't agree with other
    observations, like the red- (or blue-) shift variation from one side
    to the other. Our models of galactic motion already have trouble
    explaining how galaxies manage to hold together with rotational
    periods in the hundreds of millions of years (hence the posited "dark
    matter" to give them more gravity); the discrepancy would be that
    much worse if their rate of rotation were orders of magnitude faster.
    Moreover most spiral galaxies' arms can be seen to 'wrap' all the way
    around the hub, or even several times around, which I don't think can
    be reconciled with a time-lag explanation. Finally, we see plenty of
    spirals 'face-on' or nearly so, in which case all the light we see
    must have been emitted at about the same time, give or take a few
    thousand years.

    --
    Odysseus

  5. #5
    OG's Avatar
    OG Guest

    Default Galaxies and spiral arms


    "Jeff Hammersmark" <jdhammer@telus.net> wrote in message
    news:ZME5d.116052$KU5.112508@edtnps89...
    that we
    isn't face
    spiral

    Jeff,
    For that to be the case, the radius of the galaxy (in light years)
    would have to be a fairly high proportion of the rotation period (in
    years).

    I'm not saying its impossible, but I'm not aware that there have been
    any such examples. For example, our Galaxy has a diameter of some
    100,000 Ly, but its rotation period is something like 250 - 300 Million
    years. In the time that light takes to travel across the radius of the
    galaxy, the galaxy rotates something like one fiftieth of a degree.

    It would be an interesting exercise to work out the mass of the galaxy
    that would rotate with a period of (let us say) 1 million years.
    However, I don't expect we'll ever find any which are the size of the
    Galaxy, but can rotate so rapidly.

    It's a good question though - don't be afraid to ask more like that.



 

 

Similar Threads

  1. Andromeda galaxy magnitude of core v spiral arms ?
    By Minorblues in forum Astronomy Forum
    Replies: 12
    Last Post: 11-08-2010, 04:23 PM
  2. Spiral Arms, Supernovae, & Mass Extinctions
    By Widdekind in forum Astrophysics Forum
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 01-03-2010, 12:51 PM
  3. Spiral Arms of the Milky Way
    By lanky_lx5 in forum Amateur Astronomy Forum
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 02-24-2007, 08:58 PM
  4. dark matter and spiral galaxies
    By Liam in forum Amateur Astronomy Forum
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 10-07-2006, 10:20 PM
  5. Can I see any spiral galaxies with an etx-60at ?
    By Jim in forum Amateur Astronomy Forum
    Replies: 15
    Last Post: 02-17-2006, 03:38 PM

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.2.0
Powered by vBulletin®
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:16 PM.