Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123
Results 21 to 28 of 28
Like Tree62Likes

Thread: National geographic vs celestron

  1. #21
    Kevin Benjamin's Avatar
    Kevin Benjamin is offline White Dwarf
    Points: 327, Level: 6
    Level completed: 54%, Points required for next Level: 23
    Overall activity: 0%
    Achievements:
    2 Posts Achievement
    Join Date
    Feb 2018
    Location
    Philadelphia
    Posts
    7
    Points
    327
    Level
    6
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0x 0 Posts

    Default Re: National geographic vs celestron



    Hello Everyone, Thank you for the suggestions provided. I will follow the steps for now and when i have enough money i will follow your guide on buying a good scope.

    Thanks!

  2. #22
    Kevin Benjamin's Avatar
    Kevin Benjamin is offline White Dwarf
    Points: 327, Level: 6
    Level completed: 54%, Points required for next Level: 23
    Overall activity: 0%
    Achievements:
    2 Posts Achievement
    Join Date
    Feb 2018
    Location
    Philadelphia
    Posts
    7
    Points
    327
    Level
    6
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0x 0 Posts

    Default Re: National geographic vs celestron

    Hi Guys, has anyone looked at the sun thru the telescope? why we should not see the sun?

  3. #23
    dagadget's Avatar
    dagadget is online now HYPER GIANT
    Points: 12,668, Level: 77
    Level completed: 77%, Points required for next Level: 82
    Overall activity: 6.0%
    Achievements:
    2 Posts Achievement20 Posts Achievement!50 Posts Achievement!200+ Posts Achievement!First 1000 Experience Points
    Join Date
    Aug 2016
    Location
    Avon Park, Florida
    Posts
    2,611
    Points
    12,668
    Level
    77
    Thanks
    857
    Thanked 599x 557 Posts

    Default Re: National geographic vs celestron

    Quote Originally Posted by Kevin Benjamin View Post
    Hi Guys, has anyone looked at the sun thru the telescope? why we should not see the sun?
    Sure many of us have great solar filters for doing just that. I would not suggest trying it unless you have good filters or maybe using Binoculars with a very dark welding glass in front of the Binos. The OP has a tough choice on two small scopes.... Binoculars would be just as good and maybe better...
    Kevin Benjamin likes this.
    Astro-Tech AT 152EDT CGEM II Mount AKA FracZilla
    Celestron CPC 1100 GPS AKA Cloudzilla
    Home Made 8 inch Newtonian Reflector on Rocker Box AKA Scopezilla
    Celestron 4 1/2 114 mm Newtonian Telescope 910 F/L GT Mount AKA Frankenscope.
    AVX Mount. TS Supercharge Bino Viewer.

    David

  4. #24
    Gabby76's Avatar
    Gabby76 is offline Super Moderator
    Points: 71,792, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 99.9%
    Achievements:
    2 Posts Achievement20 Posts Achievement!Gallery Achievement!Album Achievement!50 Posts Achievement!
    Awards:
    Hyperactive Geek - Silver 2rst place for Activity!
    Join Date
    Jan 2016
    Location
    Live: Slovakia Work: Canada
    Posts
    16,669
    Points
    71,792
    Level
    100
    Thanks
    2,777
    Thanked 5,229x 4,421 Posts
    Blog Entries
    4

    Default Re: National geographic vs celestron

    Quote Originally Posted by dagadget View Post
    I would not suggest trying it unless you have good filters or maybe using Binoculars with a very dark welding glass in front of the Binos.
    Just to be very, very clear on this point, welders glass can be used but is not as good as a proper solar filter and it must be a MINIMUM of #14 shade.
    Anything less and you can still damage/ permanently damage your eyes.
    dagadget and Kevin Benjamin like this.
    Refractors: Antares 105 f/15, Bresser 102XL f/13.2, Celestron 102 f/6.5, 2-150 f/8, Stellarvue NHNG 80 f/6.9, TAL 100RS f/10, TS 102 f/11, Vixen SD115s f/7.7
    Mounts: Manfrotto 028B/ 055PRO, Celestron SLT, Celestron CG-5/ Argo Navis, Stellarvue M2C, Vixen SXP Binoculars: Celestron Eyepieces: A-Z

    To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 5 or greater. You currently have 0 signatures.

    The weakest link in the optical chain is the large nut located directly behind the
    To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 5 or greater. You currently have 0 signatures.
    / camera. - Gabrielle

    Ya gotta keep this Apo/
    To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 5 or greater. You currently have 0 signatures.
    thing in some balance of perspective. Apos are awesome, but long focus Achros aren't that far behind them - Siriusandthepup (CN)

    Refractors kick arse precisely because they don't hide behind excuses. That is, they have no obstructions to hide behind.

    To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 5 or greater. You currently have 0 signatures.

  5. #25
    dagadget's Avatar
    dagadget is online now HYPER GIANT
    Points: 12,668, Level: 77
    Level completed: 77%, Points required for next Level: 82
    Overall activity: 6.0%
    Achievements:
    2 Posts Achievement20 Posts Achievement!50 Posts Achievement!200+ Posts Achievement!First 1000 Experience Points
    Join Date
    Aug 2016
    Location
    Avon Park, Florida
    Posts
    2,611
    Points
    12,668
    Level
    77
    Thanks
    857
    Thanked 599x 557 Posts

    Default Re: National geographic vs celestron

    Quote Originally Posted by Gabby76 View Post
    Just to be very, very clear on this point, welders glass can be used but is not as good as a proper solar filter and it must be a MINIMUM of #14 shade.
    Anything less and you can still damage/ permanently damage your eyes.
    Interesting the only shade of welding glass I ever get is 14 (Very Dark) the other ones are about useless for solar viewing.... but since I have a solar filter the #14 glass is no longer used here.
    Kevin Benjamin likes this.
    Astro-Tech AT 152EDT CGEM II Mount AKA FracZilla
    Celestron CPC 1100 GPS AKA Cloudzilla
    Home Made 8 inch Newtonian Reflector on Rocker Box AKA Scopezilla
    Celestron 4 1/2 114 mm Newtonian Telescope 910 F/L GT Mount AKA Frankenscope.
    AVX Mount. TS Supercharge Bino Viewer.

    David

  6. #26
    Gabby76's Avatar
    Gabby76 is offline Super Moderator
    Points: 71,792, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 99.9%
    Achievements:
    2 Posts Achievement20 Posts Achievement!Gallery Achievement!Album Achievement!50 Posts Achievement!
    Awards:
    Hyperactive Geek - Silver 2rst place for Activity!
    Join Date
    Jan 2016
    Location
    Live: Slovakia Work: Canada
    Posts
    16,669
    Points
    71,792
    Level
    100
    Thanks
    2,777
    Thanked 5,229x 4,421 Posts
    Blog Entries
    4

    Default Re: National geographic vs celestron

    It can be used if you do not have proper solar glasses and such. A good use for it is to cover RDF finders so you do not burn out the reticle.
    I just did not want anyone grabbing a regular 9-11 welders lens to check the solar disk out
    Refractors: Antares 105 f/15, Bresser 102XL f/13.2, Celestron 102 f/6.5, 2-150 f/8, Stellarvue NHNG 80 f/6.9, TAL 100RS f/10, TS 102 f/11, Vixen SD115s f/7.7
    Mounts: Manfrotto 028B/ 055PRO, Celestron SLT, Celestron CG-5/ Argo Navis, Stellarvue M2C, Vixen SXP Binoculars: Celestron Eyepieces: A-Z

    To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 5 or greater. You currently have 0 signatures.

    The weakest link in the optical chain is the large nut located directly behind the
    To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 5 or greater. You currently have 0 signatures.
    / camera. - Gabrielle

    Ya gotta keep this Apo/
    To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 5 or greater. You currently have 0 signatures.
    thing in some balance of perspective. Apos are awesome, but long focus Achros aren't that far behind them - Siriusandthepup (CN)

    Refractors kick arse precisely because they don't hide behind excuses. That is, they have no obstructions to hide behind.

    To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 5 or greater. You currently have 0 signatures.

  7. #27
    carter2002's Avatar
    carter2002 is offline HYPER GIANT
    Points: 11,103, Level: 72
    Level completed: 85%, Points required for next Level: 47
    Overall activity: 0%
    Achievements:
    2 Posts Achievement20 Posts Achievement!5 Threads Achievement!5+ Referrals Achievement!50 Posts Achievement!
    Join Date
    Aug 2017
    Location
    TinTop, TX
    Posts
    1,780
    Points
    11,103
    Level
    72
    Thanks
    1,693
    Thanked 650x 571 Posts

    Default Re: National geographic vs celestron

    Hey there Kevin, sounds like you have plenty of advice, just want to welcome you to the forums! johnnyb
    Kevin Benjamin likes this.
    johnnyb -
    To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 5 or greater. You currently have 0 signatures.
    XT10G, ES 62 degree 9mm, ES 82 degree 18mm, Celestron Skymaster 20x80 binocs, Celestron Skymaster 12x60 binocs, Oberwerk 10x60 Marine Binocs, Simmons 10x50 binocs, Vestil CPRO 600, Nikon D90
    To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 5 or greater. You currently have 0 signatures.
    with an assortment of lenses and a wide plethora of questions.

  8. #28
    Kevin Benjamin's Avatar
    Kevin Benjamin is offline White Dwarf
    Points: 327, Level: 6
    Level completed: 54%, Points required for next Level: 23
    Overall activity: 0%
    Achievements:
    2 Posts Achievement
    Join Date
    Feb 2018
    Location
    Philadelphia
    Posts
    7
    Points
    327
    Level
    6
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0x 0 Posts

    Default Re: National geographic vs celestron

    Thanks guys and can u post a pic of the sun taken thru your telescope.

    Thanks Carter!

 

 
Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123

Similar Threads

  1. National Geographic Guide to the Night Sky
    By aeajr in forum Astronomy Books Forum
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 02-13-2018, 12:34 AM
  2. National Geographic: MARS Special
    By combat48 in forum Space Forums
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: 12-21-2016, 11:35 PM
  3. National Geographic - telescopes
    By Rich in forum Amateur Astronomy Forum
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 01-28-2007, 07:57 AM
  4. Change through the National Geographic
    By oriel36 in forum UK Astronomy Forum
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 05-26-2006, 10:49 AM
  5. Thanks re: National Geographic Maksutov
    By Amyotte in forum Amateur Astronomy Forum
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 05-08-2004, 11:56 AM

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.2.0
Powered by vBulletin®
All times are GMT. The time now is 03:27 AM.