Page 5 of 5 FirstFirst ... 345
Results 41 to 47 of 47
Like Tree142Likes

Thread: New SN alert - SN 2018ivc in Messier 77

  1. #41
    KT4HX's Avatar
    KT4HX is offline HYPER GIANT
    Points: 99,566, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 13.0%
    Achievements:
    365 Days+ Registered Achievement!First 1000 Experience Points750 Days+ Registered Achievement!1000 Days+ Registered Achievement!200+ Posts Achievement!
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Virginia
    Posts
    11,710
    Points
    99,566
    Level
    100
    Thanks
    1,393
    Thanked 8,019x 4,327 Posts
    Blog Entries
    200

    Default Re: New SN alert - SN 2018ivc in Messier 77



    Quote Originally Posted by not_Fritz_Argelander View Post
    There's photometry in this link https://wis-tns.weizmann.ac.il/object/2018ivc stating magnitude 15 and fading.
    Yeah, I am aware of that, however, can you clarify for me what "type" of magnitude does this refer to as it doesn't specify as far as I could see? That certainly doesn't track with the visual appearance I got three nights ago. Unless my perception of its brightness as compared to the mag 13.2 star north of the galaxy is way off track.
    Alan || My DSO Blog:
    To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 5 or greater. You currently have 0 signatures.

    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Astro Sky 17.5 f/4.5 Dob || Apertura AD12 f/5 Dob || Zhumell Z10 f/4.9 Dob
    ES AR127 f/6.5 and ES ED80 f/6 on Twilight-II Mount
    ES 82° 24mm thru 4.7mm
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Astronomers: We look into the past to see our future.

  2. #42
    not_Fritz_Argelander's Avatar
    not_Fritz_Argelander is online now HYPER GIANT
    Points: 179,988, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 76.0%
    Achievements:
    365 Days+ Registered Achievement!2 Posts Achievement20 Posts Achievement!750 Days+ Registered Achievement!First 1000 Experience Points
    Awards:
    Thread Award
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Location
    US
    Posts
    21,937
    Points
    179,988
    Level
    100
    Thanks
    7,250
    Thanked 46,329x 14,908 Posts
    Blog Entries
    59

    Default Re: New SN alert - SN 2018ivc in Messier 77

    Quote Originally Posted by KT4HX View Post
    Yeah, I am aware of that, however, can you clarify for me what "type" of magnitude does this refer to as it doesn't specify as far as I could see? That certainly doesn't track with the visual appearance I got three nights ago. Unless my perception of its brightness as compared to the mag 13.2 star north of the galaxy is way off track.
    I think your perception of brightness may need adjustment. Visual estimates against a high background are notoriously unreliable.

    The largest photometry set says r-ZTF is the filter. So this is the R band filter of the Zwicky Transient Facility. A picture of the filter is on p17, fig 12 of this document:

    http://www.oir.caltech.edu/twiki_oir...8_combined.pdf

    Since comparing the flux at visual (5500) to R band (6500) about a magnitude difference is reasonable (thus allowing for greater blue sensitivity in the eye). The flus is higher in the blue as shown in the spectrum in the link cited. So that accounts for 1 of the 2 magnitudes difference. The other magnitude of difference is due to systematic error from having a bright background. The eye tends to add brightness from the background to the star.
    Last edited by not_Fritz_Argelander; 12-05-2018 at 09:17 PM.
    KT4HX likes this.

    To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 5 or greater. You currently have 0 signatures.
    : Refractors:

    To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 5 or greater. You currently have 0 signatures.
    ST80 (mods for white light solar), SV ED80 f7 Newtonians: Z12 f5 Catadioptrics: VMC110L, Intes MK66 EPs: KK Fujiyama Orthoscopics, 2x Vixen NPLs (40-6mm) and BCOs, Baader Mark IV zooms, TV Panoptics, Delos, Plossl 32-8mm. Mixed brand Masuyama/Astroplans Binocular Nikon Aculon 10x50, Celestron 15x70, Baader Maxbright. Mounts: Star Seeker III, Vixen Porta II, Celestron CG5, Orion
    To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 5 or greater. You currently have 0 signatures.
    EQG

  3. #43
    KT4HX's Avatar
    KT4HX is offline HYPER GIANT
    Points: 99,566, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 13.0%
    Achievements:
    365 Days+ Registered Achievement!First 1000 Experience Points750 Days+ Registered Achievement!1000 Days+ Registered Achievement!200+ Posts Achievement!
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Virginia
    Posts
    11,710
    Points
    99,566
    Level
    100
    Thanks
    1,393
    Thanked 8,019x 4,327 Posts
    Blog Entries
    200

    Default Re: New SN alert - SN 2018ivc in Messier 77

    Quote Originally Posted by not_Fritz_Argelander View Post
    I think your perception of brightness may need adjustment. Visual estimates against a high background are notoriously unreliable.

    The largest photometry set says r-ZTF is the filter. So this is the R band filter of the Zwicky Transient Facility. A picture of the filter is on p17, fig 12 of this document:

    http://www.oir.caltech.edu/twiki_oir...8_combined.pdf

    Since comparing the flux at visual (5500) to R band (6500) about a magnitude difference is reasonable (thus allowing for greater blue sensitivity in the eye). The flus is higher in the blue as shown in the spectrum in the link cited. So that accounts for 1 of the 2 magnitudes difference. The other magnitude of difference is due to systematic error from having a bright background. The eye tends to add brightness from the background to the star.
    Thanks for the clarification. Indeed the brightness of the central region of M77 is problematic. I also considered that the bright knot (H-II region) east of the SN could possibly be influencing my perception of the star's brightness. Visual appearances are always subject to illusory affect. Regardless, it is in the log with both the 12 and 17.5 so am satisfied with that.
    Alan || My DSO Blog:
    To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 5 or greater. You currently have 0 signatures.

    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Astro Sky 17.5 f/4.5 Dob || Apertura AD12 f/5 Dob || Zhumell Z10 f/4.9 Dob
    ES AR127 f/6.5 and ES ED80 f/6 on Twilight-II Mount
    ES 82° 24mm thru 4.7mm
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Astronomers: We look into the past to see our future.

  4. The Following User Says Thank You to KT4HX For This Useful Post:

    not_Fritz_Argelander (12-05-2018)

  5. #44
    j.gardavsky's Avatar
    j.gardavsky is offline Super Moderator
    Points: 108,923, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 77.0%
    Achievements:
    Ghost Achievement! Averaging 5+ posts a day!200+ Posts Achievement!400+ Posts AchievementFirst 1000 Experience Points365 Days+ Registered Achievement!
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    Germany
    Posts
    14,194
    Points
    108,923
    Level
    100
    Thanks
    14,190
    Thanked 8,637x 5,622 Posts

    Default Re: New SN alert - SN 2018ivc in Messier 77

    Quote Originally Posted by KT4HX View Post
    Thanks for the clarification. Indeed the brightness of the central region of M77 is problematic. I also considered that the bright knot (H-II region) east of the SN could possibly be influencing my perception of the star's brightness. Visual appearances are always subject to illusory affect. Regardless, it is in the log with both the 12 and 17.5 so am satisfied with that.
    Hello Alan, and on a side line,

    I can remember to have seen, and to have reported here, the last bright supernova in M101 through the binoculars, even if it should not have been visible through the binoculars, as the Ursa Major has been low above the NE horizon.
    I have also made a sketch, even if I am otherwise not sketching,
    and I even remember that the SN has been at "7 o'clock" off the M101 core.
    It sounds like as if the galaxy glow would "amplify" the brightness of a proxy SN, otherwise hardly visible if far away.

    Thank you very much for your description of the SN in M77, I have lerned a lot from you how to observe such events,

    JG
    Binoculars: Leica Ultravid 7x42, 8x42HD; Swarovski EL 8.5x42 Swarovision; Nikon 10x70 Astroluxe; Docter Nobilem 7x50 Porro; Jenoptem 7x50W, 10x50W; BA8: 10.5x70, 15x85; 25x100FB, AsahiPentax 8x40, Refractors: Sky-Watcher 150mm/750mm; Leica APO Televid 82mm (25x-50x WW ASPH); EPs:Baader Classic Orthos; Fujiyama ortho, Leica B WW, ultrawide zoom ASPH, Periplan GF, HC Plan S, L; DOCTER UWA; Wild UW mil; Tele Vue Delos, Nagler Zoom, Plössls; Swarovski SW; Pentax XW; ZEISS diascope B WW T*, Carl Zeiss E-Pl; Hensoldt mil; Filters: Astrodon, Astronomik, Baader (CCD), TS;
    To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 5 or greater. You currently have 0 signatures.
    : AstroTrac; Leica R7: Leica 2/50, 2/90mm, 2.8/180mm lenses
    Astronomy Forum Rules and Terms of Service
    To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 5 or greater. You currently have 0 signatures.

  6. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to j.gardavsky For This Useful Post:

    KT4HX (12-05-2018),not_Fritz_Argelander (12-05-2018)

  7. #45
    not_Fritz_Argelander's Avatar
    not_Fritz_Argelander is online now HYPER GIANT
    Points: 179,988, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 76.0%
    Achievements:
    365 Days+ Registered Achievement!2 Posts Achievement20 Posts Achievement!750 Days+ Registered Achievement!First 1000 Experience Points
    Awards:
    Thread Award
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Location
    US
    Posts
    21,937
    Points
    179,988
    Level
    100
    Thanks
    7,250
    Thanked 46,329x 14,908 Posts
    Blog Entries
    59

    Default Re: New SN alert - SN 2018ivc in Messier 77

    I think the usual rule for limiting stellar magnitude is pessimistic anyway. It is also magnification dependent. See figure 11 in the following link for a more realistic (IMO) appraisal that includes the dependency on exit pupil:

    https://www.telescope-optics.net/functions.htm
    KT4HX and j.gardavsky like this.

    To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 5 or greater. You currently have 0 signatures.
    : Refractors:

    To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 5 or greater. You currently have 0 signatures.
    ST80 (mods for white light solar), SV ED80 f7 Newtonians: Z12 f5 Catadioptrics: VMC110L, Intes MK66 EPs: KK Fujiyama Orthoscopics, 2x Vixen NPLs (40-6mm) and BCOs, Baader Mark IV zooms, TV Panoptics, Delos, Plossl 32-8mm. Mixed brand Masuyama/Astroplans Binocular Nikon Aculon 10x50, Celestron 15x70, Baader Maxbright. Mounts: Star Seeker III, Vixen Porta II, Celestron CG5, Orion
    To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 5 or greater. You currently have 0 signatures.
    EQG

  8. #46
    j.gardavsky's Avatar
    j.gardavsky is offline Super Moderator
    Points: 108,923, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 77.0%
    Achievements:
    Ghost Achievement! Averaging 5+ posts a day!200+ Posts Achievement!400+ Posts AchievementFirst 1000 Experience Points365 Days+ Registered Achievement!
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    Germany
    Posts
    14,194
    Points
    108,923
    Level
    100
    Thanks
    14,190
    Thanked 8,637x 5,622 Posts

    Default Re: New SN alert - SN 2018ivc in Messier 77

    Quote Originally Posted by not_Fritz_Argelander View Post
    I think the usual rule for limiting stellar magnitude is pessimistic anyway. It is also magnification dependent. See figure 11 in the following link for a more realistic (IMO) appraisal that includes the dependency on exit pupil:

    https://www.telescope-optics.net/functions.htm
    Hello not_Fritz,

    I agree!
    It is also the nonlinear response to the brightness, and the integration time which pulls out the faint stars.
    Thank you for the link,

    JG
    Binoculars: Leica Ultravid 7x42, 8x42HD; Swarovski EL 8.5x42 Swarovision; Nikon 10x70 Astroluxe; Docter Nobilem 7x50 Porro; Jenoptem 7x50W, 10x50W; BA8: 10.5x70, 15x85; 25x100FB, AsahiPentax 8x40, Refractors: Sky-Watcher 150mm/750mm; Leica APO Televid 82mm (25x-50x WW ASPH); EPs:Baader Classic Orthos; Fujiyama ortho, Leica B WW, ultrawide zoom ASPH, Periplan GF, HC Plan S, L; DOCTER UWA; Wild UW mil; Tele Vue Delos, Nagler Zoom, Plössls; Swarovski SW; Pentax XW; ZEISS diascope B WW T*, Carl Zeiss E-Pl; Hensoldt mil; Filters: Astrodon, Astronomik, Baader (CCD), TS;
    To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 5 or greater. You currently have 0 signatures.
    : AstroTrac; Leica R7: Leica 2/50, 2/90mm, 2.8/180mm lenses
    Astronomy Forum Rules and Terms of Service
    To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 5 or greater. You currently have 0 signatures.

  9. #47
    KT4HX's Avatar
    KT4HX is offline HYPER GIANT
    Points: 99,566, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 13.0%
    Achievements:
    365 Days+ Registered Achievement!First 1000 Experience Points750 Days+ Registered Achievement!1000 Days+ Registered Achievement!200+ Posts Achievement!
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Virginia
    Posts
    11,710
    Points
    99,566
    Level
    100
    Thanks
    1,393
    Thanked 8,019x 4,327 Posts
    Blog Entries
    200

    Default Re: New SN alert - SN 2018ivc in Messier 77

    Quote Originally Posted by j.gardavsky View Post
    Hello Alan, and on a side line,

    I can remember to have seen, and to have reported here, the last bright supernova in M101 through the binoculars, even if it should not have been visible through the binoculars, as the Ursa Major has been low above the NE horizon.
    I have also made a sketch, even if I am otherwise not sketching,
    and I even remember that the SN has been at "7 o'clock" off the M101 core.
    It sounds like as if the galaxy glow would "amplify" the brightness of a proxy SN, otherwise hardly visible if far away.

    Thank you very much for your description of the SN in M77, I have learned a lot from you how to observe such events,

    JG
    Thank you JG. I also recall that one as well. I believe it was SN 2011fe. I too saw it with binoculars, but very, very faintly as I was at a more southern location at the time.

    I have seen time and time again while observing galaxies over the decades that seemingly bright (by magnitude) foreground stars imposed upon a galaxy can be lost within the overall glow of the galaxy. Either they are reduced in apparent brightness or simply not seen. That is not true in every case obviously, but I've seen it more often than some may think.

    Quote Originally Posted by not_Fritz_Argelander View Post
    I think the usual rule for limiting stellar magnitude is pessimistic anyway. It is also magnification dependent. See figure 11 in the following link for a more realistic (IMO) appraisal that includes the dependency on exit pupil:

    https://www.telescope-optics.net/functions.htm
    Thanks for the link nFA. As we all know, limiting stellar magnitude is full of variables, particularly from one observer to the next. I would also add that sky conditions will noticeably impact it as well. My limiting magnitude with the same scope using the same magnitude is quite different from our typically Bortle 5 backyard as compared to our normally Bortle 3 dark site house.
    Alan || My DSO Blog:
    To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 5 or greater. You currently have 0 signatures.

    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Astro Sky 17.5 f/4.5 Dob || Apertura AD12 f/5 Dob || Zhumell Z10 f/4.9 Dob
    ES AR127 f/6.5 and ES ED80 f/6 on Twilight-II Mount
    ES 82° 24mm thru 4.7mm
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Astronomers: We look into the past to see our future.

  10. The Following User Says Thank You to KT4HX For This Useful Post:

    j.gardavsky (12-06-2018)

 

 
Page 5 of 5 FirstFirst ... 345

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 1
    Last Post: 12-03-2016, 03:09 AM
  2. Messier 40 Photos Results of My Photo Messier Marathon and Beginning of My Messier 40
    By M111 in forum Astrophotography Forum
    Replies: 18
    Last Post: 05-26-2015, 02:01 AM
  3. DSLR Deep Sky Imaging: Bode's Nebula, The Whirlpool Galaxy, Messier 13, and Messier 78
    By jschr338 in forum Astrophotography Forum
    Replies: 12
    Last Post: 05-14-2013, 11:26 AM
  4. Messier 30 Certificate - Wayne's path to the first Messier step
    By UrbanArmitage in forum Astronomy Reports Forum
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 03-18-2013, 08:16 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.2.0
Powered by vBulletin®
All times are GMT. The time now is 09:45 AM.