Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123
Results 21 to 27 of 27
Like Tree8Likes

Thread: 8x40 vs 7x50

  1. #21
    Johannes's Avatar
    Johannes is offline Main Sequence
    Points: 7,410, Level: 60
    Level completed: 30%, Points required for next Level: 140
    Overall activity: 0%
    Achievements:
    10 Days registeredFirst 1000 Experience Points365 Days+ Registered Achievement!750 Days+ Registered Achievement!3 Years + Achievement
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    Houston
    Posts
    71
    Points
    7,410
    Level
    60
    Thanks
    51
    Thanked 38x 25 Posts

    Default



    The (EP^2)*M (or EP*D) formula is interesting, but should not be taken at face value.

    Let's take two binos that yield a value of 320:
    What would you prefer for a night under the stars: 20x80 astronomy binoculars or 5x40 opera glasses...?
    Last edited by Johannes; 05-13-2011 at 04:33 AM.

  2. #22
    tony884's Avatar
    tony884 is offline White Dwarf
    Points: 4,744, Level: 46
    Level completed: 97%, Points required for next Level: 6
    Overall activity: 0%
    Achievements:
    365 Days+ Registered Achievement!750 Days+ Registered Achievement!First 1000 Experience Points50 Posts Achievement!2 Posts Achievement
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    Auckland NZ
    Posts
    30
    Points
    4,744
    Level
    46
    Thanks
    2
    Thanked 14x 11 Posts

    Default

    Glad I could be of some assistance.

  3. #23
    tony884's Avatar
    tony884 is offline White Dwarf
    Points: 4,744, Level: 46
    Level completed: 97%, Points required for next Level: 6
    Overall activity: 0%
    Achievements:
    365 Days+ Registered Achievement!750 Days+ Registered Achievement!First 1000 Experience Points50 Posts Achievement!2 Posts Achievement
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    Auckland NZ
    Posts
    30
    Points
    4,744
    Level
    46
    Thanks
    2
    Thanked 14x 11 Posts

    Default

    Hi Johannes, its true what you say, and I think nearly all people would opt for the 20x80's. However, if some were wanting to familiarise themselves with the constellations they might find hand-holding these mothers and their approx 3 degrees FOV a bit limiting! (initially atleast!) I've no idea what the FOV's are for opera glasses (Probably not much) I think the equation can be a useful guide though, for example where I gave the 20x50's a hard time earlier with my review. They only yield 125 in the EP squared*M equation, giving a pretty good indication of how bad they are for astronomical use! (In my opinion). As always, we need to use common sense.

  4. #24
    David Bea's Avatar
    David Bea is offline White Dwarf
    Points: 140, Level: 2
    Level completed: 80%, Points required for next Level: 10
    Overall activity: 0%
    Achievements:
    2 Posts Achievement20 Posts Achievement!
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Location
    Gateshead
    Posts
    4
    Points
    140
    Level
    2
    Thanks
    6
    Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post

    Default Re: 8x40 vs 7x50

    Quote Originally Posted by Arny Moots View Post
    What a fascinating bit of research! The only real way to tell if a binocular is better than another is, of course, to get out there and test the things!

    The fact that for you the 7x50s be the brightest means that you are better with a 7mm exit pupil.

    So I wonder how true it is about the iris shrinking to 5mm by middle age?
    The issue of pupil dilation comes up all the time in forums reviewing binoculars. Let me state that it isn't a given. For most people, the pupils will lose a couple of mm by late middle age, but some only lose a little and some lucky people in their 60s can still achieve very close t0 7mm. The idea that once you reach middle age (when is that today?) you can no longer use the advantage of a 7mm exit pupil needs to be treated with a bit of caution. Most healthy people in middle age will achieve a bit more than 5mm, but it may take a little longer.

    What I hope people will realise is that you need to try the binoculars that suit your use, and if you prefer the 7x50s and you're over 40 then trust yourself, rather than what is repeated without correct analysis of the evidence. Check out the evidence in the charts in this site Pupil size, large pupils and LASIK: WARNING!!!
    If the 10x50s work better for you, then it may well be that you are in the majority of people in your age group that suits them more.

  5. #25
    johnrfeeney's Avatar
    johnrfeeney is offline Banned
    Points: 32,257, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 0%
    Achievements:
    2 Posts Achievement20 Posts Achievement!50 Posts Achievement!5 Threads Achievement!200+ Posts Achievement!
    Awards:
    Visitor Message Award
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Location
    Temecula, CA 33*31N 117*08W
    Posts
    6,298
    Points
    32,257
    Level
    100
    Thanks
    1,609
    Thanked 1,352x 1,320 Posts

    Default Re: 8x40 vs 7x50

    Great great report - i am looking into something on the order of the 8 x 40's and would love to look through them, want them for wide field constellation work

  6. #26
    Lou3's Avatar
    Lou3 is offline Main Sequence
    Points: 4,233, Level: 43
    Level completed: 89%, Points required for next Level: 17
    Overall activity: 0%
    Achievements:
    2 Posts Achievement20 Posts Achievement!365 Days+ Registered Achievement!50 Posts Achievement!5 Threads Achievement!
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Location
    Philadelphia suburbs, PA, USA
    Posts
    56
    Points
    4,233
    Level
    43
    Thanks
    11
    Thanked 10x 7 Posts

    Default Re: 8x40 vs 7x50

    Quote Originally Posted by tony884 View Post
    Hi JG,
    Both are excellent replies, thanks. I now own the 7x50 Action EX
    Quote Originally Posted by admin View Post
    I recently got the 7X50 and I think they are a great balance of wide-field views, steady views, and price (for me in Australia at least as other binoculars are outrageously priced and many are junk).
    Congrats on your new binoculars. I prefer 7-power and a 7mm exit pupil for ease of holding, so I've been thinking about the Action EX 7x50. My first astro bino was the Action 7x35,and its 9.3° FOV spoiled me. For that reason, as well as optical quality, I'm also considering the Williams Optics 7x50 ED.

    Quote Originally Posted by David Bea View Post
    The issue of pupil dilation comes up all the time in forums reviewing binoculars. Let me state that it isn't a given. For most people, the pupils will lose a couple of mm by late middle age, but some only lose a little and some lucky people in their 60s can still achieve very close t0 7mm. The idea that once you reach middle age (when is that today?) you can no longer use the advantage of a 7mm exit pupil needs to be treated with a bit of caution. Most healthy people in middle age will achieve a bit more than 5mm, but it may take a little longer.

    What I hope people will realise is that you need to try the binoculars that suit your use, and if you prefer the 7x50s and you're over 40 then trust yourself, rather than what is repeated without correct analysis of the evidence. Check out the evidence in the charts in this site Pupil size, large pupils and LASIK: WARNING!!!
    If the 10x50s work better for you, then it may well be that you are in the majority of people in your age group that suits them more.
    Thank you for posting this. I'm 45 and much prefer my 8x56's exit pupil to that of the 7x35 and 8x42 I used to have. It's more forgiving of shakiness, and the 8x56 gives nicer views, even of my orange-red zone skies.

    Quote Originally Posted by johnrfeeney View Post
    Great great report - i am looking into something on the order of the 8 x 40's and would love to look through them, want them for wide field constellation work
    If you want a wide FOV for constellation work, consider the Action EX 7x35 too. I could fit entire small constellations and several stars of larger constellations in the view. The short barrels put all the weight in your hands, not hanging out front, which makes the bino easy to hold for long periods of time.
    Last edited by Lou3; 08-24-2013 at 12:41 AM.
    j.gardavsky likes this.
    telescope: in between telescopes
    binoculars: Celestron SkyMaster DX 8x56 | Celestron Cometron 7x50 | Vortex Raptor 6.5x32

  7. #27
    David Bea's Avatar
    David Bea is offline White Dwarf
    Points: 140, Level: 2
    Level completed: 80%, Points required for next Level: 10
    Overall activity: 0%
    Achievements:
    2 Posts Achievement20 Posts Achievement!
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Location
    Gateshead
    Posts
    4
    Points
    140
    Level
    2
    Thanks
    6
    Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post

    Default Re: 8x40 vs 7x50

    Lou3,

    I posted this in another thread, but I'll repost here as it's very relevant to decision making:

    If you are wanting to know more to make the decision about the right magnification for you (the brand is another matter and definitely needs the buyer to try lots first), it's usually said that a pair of 10x50s will enable you to see around half a magnitude more than 7x50s. That's actually a significant improvement for Astronomical purposes. For daytime use I find that the increased magnification is much less beneficial i.e. the difference between the naked eye and 7x or 8x is huge, but jump from 7x or 8x to 10x and it is slight - but with tremor!

    Another point is that a mount, or a truly, rock steady grip will add another half a degree to the magnitude of objects revealed. Again, quite significant for astronomers. So it's fair to say that a 7x50 will possibly nearly equal a 10x50 that isn't mounted i.e. the benefit being cancelled by the tremor for some people. However, a mounted 10x50 could be much, much better. In practice I find that too.

    Being a bit lazy and spontaneous, and living in a place where the winter nights are bitterly cold - often - the thought of being out for a long time, setting up a tripod and mounting, takes some pleasure out of viewing when I could be sweeping the heavens with 7x50s or 8x40s for a quick fix. As I said earlier, if you really feel that you might be missing out on some fainter objects, etc, then you are generally better to get a telescope instead or as well - which is the ideal."
    MLaferriere likes this.

  8. The Following User Says Thank You to David Bea For This Useful Post:

    Lou3 (08-24-2013)

 

 
Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123

Similar Threads

  1. Nikon EX 7x50 vs. Buschnell Marine 7x50
    By Baruch in forum Binoculars Forum
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: 08-11-2014, 06:24 PM
  2. Celestron UpClose 8x40
    By GregLee in forum Binoculars Forum
    Replies: 13
    Last Post: 12-21-2009, 07:37 PM
  3. Advice on Nikon 8x40 Action?
    By Kinney Baughman in forum Amateur Astronomy Forum
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: 12-01-2007, 09:10 PM
  4. Has anyone tried NIKON 8x40 Action Aspherical binos ?
    By David in forum Amateur Astronomy Forum
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 09-09-2003, 04:02 AM

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.2.0
Powered by vBulletin®
All times are GMT. The time now is 09:23 AM.