Go Back   Astronomy Forums > Astronomy Forums > ATM DIY Telescope Making Forum

ATM DIY Telescope Making Forum ATM Amateur Telescope Making and DIY Telescope Making Forum. Discuss building, grinding mirrors, and more here.


Wood type

ATM DIY Telescope Making Forum - Wood type


Welcome to the Astronomy Forums.
Advertising shown is NOT shown to registered, active members or donators.
Please Register Now! takes only seconds! Get your FREE account today, to see photos, get INSTANT & friendly HELP, ADVICE, and meet FRIENDS! on Astronomy Forums

Astronomy Forum is a friendly discussion community for astronomy. You are currently viewing the board as a GUEST. Register Now! to participate in the community, unlock all of the benefits and features, best of all registration is totally FREE!




Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 06-30-2009, 08:12 PM
Member
Points: 582, Level: 11 Points: 582, Level: 11 Points: 582, Level: 11
Activity: 0.5% Activity: 0.5% Activity: 0.5%
Last Achievements
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 46
Thanks: 7
Thanked 6 Times in 5 Posts
Downloads: 0
Uploads: 0
Default Wood type




I've been reading Kriege and Berry's "The Dobsonian Telescope" in anticipation of building a 17.5" scope. With my recent purchase of a 16" Starfinder, I'm now pushing forward in figuring out how to do both so that I can actually transport and utilize these beauties without a personal assistant. I've hit my first serious roadblock: finding the correct wood. The book recommends Appleply or Baltic Birch, but after calling a dozen different lumber yards, woodshops, and cabinet makers, nobody knows where to get these. One person said that they have a supplier that makes something similar to Appleply, but that it costs around $185 per 5x5 sheet. I'm wondering where others have purchased the wood for their scopes in the 16"-17.5" range, and if other woods have been used. Of course the results are important. I'd really like to do this right, so I'm willing to put out some money, but I'd like to know that I'm getting the right product for the job. Thank you in advance for your help with this. (I love these forums!)
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Alt
Advertising
Sponsors
 
The advertising shown here is not shown
to registered members. Please
Register Now! takes only seconds! Get your free account today
to be a FREE member on
Astronomy Forums
Standard Sponsored Site

Old 07-01-2009, 01:37 AM
roverich's Avatar
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: woodbridge,va.
Posts: 4,560
Thanks: 730
Thanked 765 Times in 683 Posts
Downloads: 4
Uploads: 0

3000 Posts Award 2000 Posts Award 1000 Posts Award 

Send a message via Skype™ to roverich
Default

Hi dmmd01 ...Try these guys [Registered users can see links. ] ...I found apple ply for 94 dollars a sheet plus shipping from wisconsen...You could do another road trip and save the shipping costs ..
__________________
Rich
Lxd55 5in. 1143mm refractor on a Celestron cg5 goto
Lx90 8in.2000mm SCT fork with a wedge and std. field tripod
97d 90mm mak spotter Slik "the professional"tripod Meade series 4000 plossl set , Meade series 5000 plossl set plus others not worth mentioning ....
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to roverich For This Useful Post:
BobDob (07-01-2009), dmmd01 (07-01-2009)
Old 07-01-2009, 11:11 AM
White Dwarf
Points: 1,752, Level: 25 Points: 1,752, Level: 25 Points: 1,752, Level: 25
Activity: 0.1% Activity: 0.1% Activity: 0.1%
Last Achievements
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Chiefland, FL
Posts: 47
Thanks: 1
Thanked 53 Times in 21 Posts
Downloads: 0
Uploads: 0
Default

For the last 25 years I have been using Oak plywood with good results. It's available from plywood distributers, and even HD and Lowes for around $45 per sheet. It works and looks great.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg Tom and Fleet copy.jpg (80.3 KB, 13 views)
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to Tom Clark For This Useful Post:
admin (07-01-2009), BobDob (07-01-2009), dmmd01 (07-01-2009), roverich (07-03-2009)
Old 07-01-2009, 01:24 PM
Member
Points: 582, Level: 11 Points: 582, Level: 11 Points: 582, Level: 11
Activity: 0.5% Activity: 0.5% Activity: 0.5%
Last Achievements
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 46
Thanks: 7
Thanked 6 Times in 5 Posts
Downloads: 0
Uploads: 0
Default

Rover and Tom, Thank you both for your input. While I would love to drive back to the land where cheese flows like water, I think I'd have to pass right now. And as to oak, I'm glad to hear that you are able to use it effectively on larger dobs. The picture of your fleet is beautiful. Actually, I saw your website a few months ago before I knew I was going to be building, and now I need to get back there... Your design is exactly what I've been looking for!
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 07-01-2009, 07:42 PM
Guilty as Charged
Points: 6,024, Level: 53 Points: 6,024, Level: 53 Points: 6,024, Level: 53
Activity: 0% Activity: 0% Activity: 0%
Last Achievements
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: .
Posts: 2,290
Thanks: 11
Thanked 323 Times in 207 Posts
Downloads: 0
Uploads: 0

2000 Posts Award 1000 Posts Award 

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dmmd01 View Post
Rover and Tom, Thank you both for your input. While I would love to drive back to the land where cheese flows like water, I think I'd have to pass right now. And as to oak, I'm glad to hear that you are able to use it effectively on larger dobs. The picture of your fleet is beautiful. Actually, I saw your website a few months ago before I knew I was going to be building, and now I need to get back there... Your design is exactly what I've been looking for!
I have a telescope that I purchased from Tom almost twenty years ago and have had no problems with the oak plywood whatsoever.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 07-01-2009, 08:30 PM
Member
Points: 582, Level: 11 Points: 582, Level: 11 Points: 582, Level: 11
Activity: 0.5% Activity: 0.5% Activity: 0.5%
Last Achievements
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 46
Thanks: 7
Thanked 6 Times in 5 Posts
Downloads: 0
Uploads: 0
Default

Gotta love the testimonials!
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 07-01-2009, 09:14 PM
roverich's Avatar
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: woodbridge,va.
Posts: 4,560
Thanks: 730
Thanked 765 Times in 683 Posts
Downloads: 4
Uploads: 0

3000 Posts Award 2000 Posts Award 1000 Posts Award 

Send a message via Skype™ to roverich
Default

Hi dmmd01 ...The only drawback from using plywood or particle board is moisture getting inside and delaminating or swelling of the wood ...As long as the wood is well protected with a varnish or polyurethane and waxed regularly you should be alright ... Some viewing areas are more prone to scopes dewing up and moisture is a enemy of wood ... Especially plywoods ....Another alternative to oak plywood is Baltic birch ...Oak has great grain structure but Baltic birch is a great looking wood also and not as expensive but just as strong ...
__________________
Rich
Lxd55 5in. 1143mm refractor on a Celestron cg5 goto
Lx90 8in.2000mm SCT fork with a wedge and std. field tripod
97d 90mm mak spotter Slik "the professional"tripod Meade series 4000 plossl set , Meade series 5000 plossl set plus others not worth mentioning ....
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 07-02-2009, 11:40 AM
Member
Points: 582, Level: 11 Points: 582, Level: 11 Points: 582, Level: 11
Activity: 0.5% Activity: 0.5% Activity: 0.5%
Last Achievements
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 46
Thanks: 7
Thanked 6 Times in 5 Posts
Downloads: 0
Uploads: 0
Default

Rover, thanks for the insight - we went to Lowes and HD yesterday after calling a few more places and not being able to find BB. The 3/4 oak came in at 47.88, and the 5/8 at $21. I'm worried that the 5/8 won't be thick enough for the rings, but the 3/4 will be excessive. This project is truly a learning experience! The especially nice part though is that my wife loves designing, and has been drawing numerous possible configurations.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 07-03-2009, 02:58 AM
roverich's Avatar
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: woodbridge,va.
Posts: 4,560
Thanks: 730
Thanked 765 Times in 683 Posts
Downloads: 4
Uploads: 0

3000 Posts Award 2000 Posts Award 1000 Posts Award 

Send a message via Skype™ to roverich
Default

If it were me ...I would go with the thicker wood ...I always over engineer something when i build it ...If i am not mistaken 3/4 has thicker wood slices as opposed to 5/8 ...The same amount of wood layers but thicker layers ...Make sense ? .....Also , you can get "end tape" for the edges that is made of real oak .....You iron it on the edges of the wood panels for a nice cosmetic finish .... Its just cosmetic but it makes for a beautiful finished project when using plywoods ...
__________________
Rich
Lxd55 5in. 1143mm refractor on a Celestron cg5 goto
Lx90 8in.2000mm SCT fork with a wedge and std. field tripod
97d 90mm mak spotter Slik "the professional"tripod Meade series 4000 plossl set , Meade series 5000 plossl set plus others not worth mentioning ....
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 07-03-2009, 11:03 AM
White Dwarf
Points: 1,752, Level: 25 Points: 1,752, Level: 25 Points: 1,752, Level: 25
Activity: 0.1% Activity: 0.1% Activity: 0.1%
Last Achievements
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Chiefland, FL
Posts: 47
Thanks: 1
Thanked 53 Times in 21 Posts
Downloads: 0
Uploads: 0
Default

The Kriege book is getting rather dated in scope design. His scopes were all quite heavy compared to the norm today. About 15 years ago we started experimenting with building lighter scopes, and today everything up to my 24" is almost all 1/2" material. Our old 25" weighed 250 pounds, and the newer model 24" weighs only 160. That's quite a weight savings. I used to build 18" f/5s and they weighed 104#. On my [Registered users can see links. ] you will see many scopes built with the lighter material.

Yes, the scopes are still very solid and have almost no vibration. Give the 24" a good rap to the diagonal cage and it dampens in less than 1/2 second.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Tom Clark For This Useful Post:
roverich (07-03-2009)
Reply

Tags
type, wood


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
List of year with 2-3-4 solar eclipses , type by type ricci Solar Viewing Forum 0 03-13-2009 10:52 AM
Tom O. Wood vs Metal Richard Jarnagin Amateur Astronomy Forum 0 02-13-2007 03:03 AM
[COMM] - Oculari Tele Vue Nagler 7mm type 6 e 13mm type 6 NUOVI Armando Astronomia Forum 0 01-21-2006 02:48 PM
17mm Type 4 or 16mm Type 5? Gregory Amateur Astronomy Forum 3 06-08-2005 03:14 AM
Lunar Course by Dr Wood CLT Amateur Astronomy Forum 1 03-26-2005 08:46 AM

Astronomy Wiki (edit)
Add links to this section by editing this page.
Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT. The time now is 12:18 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2010, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright 2007-2008 Astronomy Forum .net

Login Form