Results 1 to 2 of 2
  1. #1
    DaveW's Avatar
    DaveW is offline HYPER GIANT
    Points: 13,128, Level: 79
    Level completed: 8%, Points required for next Level: 322
    Overall activity: 0%
    Achievements:
    200+ Posts Achievement!First 1000 Experience PointsGhost Achievement! Averaging 5+ posts a day!365 Days+ Registered Achievement!100+ Threads Achievement!
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    Saskatoon, Canada
    Posts
    1,792
    Points
    13,128
    Level
    79
    Thanks
    100
    Thanked 621x 447 Posts

    Default Super cheap eBay mirror



    I was looking through the eBay store of the guy I bought my t-thread to 2" adapter from, and I saw these super cheap mirror sets. I was thinking of picking one up to experiment on, as I think I'm really close to figuring out how to pack 30 hours into a day.

    My idea was to get my hands dirty and try grinding a mirror. Once the existing damaged coating was stripped, I'd grind it down to f/4.5 or f/4, and make a rich field telescope. The only worry I have is with the included 1.1" (28mm) diagonal. According to the diagonal calculator on Mel Bartle's website Mel Bartels' Diagonal Calculator, with a 114mm primary, 448 focal length, and 28mm secondary even if I can get a low enough profile focuser to put the focal plane 70mm from the diagonal, I will still have a decent amount of light loss at the edges. At the focal plane, a 68 degree EP at the minimum magnification (that gives 7mm exit pupil, about 16x magnification) would have an image radius of 16.32mm. The calculator gave me the following values.

    Off-Axis Illum. Light Loss
    0.00 mm 100.0% 0.00 mag
    2.00 mm 100.0% 0.00 mag
    4.00 mm 100.0% 0.00 mag
    6.00 mm 100.0% 0.00 mag
    8.00 mm 93.05% 0.07 mag
    10.0 mm 82.28% 0.21 mag
    12.0 mm 70.45% 0.38 mag
    14.0 mm 58.41% 0.58 mag
    16.0 mm 46.59% 0.82 mag
    18.0 mm 35.29% 1.13 mag
    20.0 mm 24.80% 1.51 mag

    At the 16mm that would be the edge of field, illumination is down to 46.6%. They say 70% loss is fine for visual use, but I'm worried about losing almost a full magnitude at the edge of the FOV. How noticeable will this effect be, do you think? Granted if I just use a little more magnification (ie, a Hyperion 24mm to give 18.67 magnification and a 3.64 degree FOV), the edge of the maximum field is only 14.25, so I'd be closer to 0.6 mag loss at the edge of field.

    Anyway, sorry about the rambling post, I like to talk as I think. I'll place a bid, worst case is I never use it and I'm out 30 bucks or less with shipping. Seems worth it to get a great rich field scope for looking at the Milky Way from a dark sky site. what do you guys think, is there anything I'm missing here that would keep this from working?
    Zhumell Z10, Celestron AstroMaster 114EQ, 10x50 and 15x70 Binoculars
    Zhumell 2" UHC Filter
    Hyperion 8mm GSO Superview 30mm and a whole case full of Plossls

    Saskatoon, SK - 106W, 52N

    To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 5 or greater. You currently have 0 signatures.

  2. The Following User Says Thank You to DaveW For This Useful Post:

    Art Bianconi (01-13-2011)

  3. #2
    Art Bianconi's Avatar
    Art Bianconi is offline Banned
    Points: 7,670, Level: 61
    Level completed: 40%, Points required for next Level: 180
    Overall activity: 0%
    Achievements:
    First 1000 Experience Points200+ Posts Achievement!400+ Posts Achievement5+ Referrals Achievement!365 Days+ Registered Achievement!
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    Delaware River Valley, Western New Jersey
    Posts
    328
    Points
    7,670
    Level
    61
    Thanks
    91
    Thanked 198x 106 Posts

    Default Your "rambling": is fine with me!

    Dave I am not an optician, not even close. My strengths are in materials, structures and mechanical design. When optical gurus start talking about strehl, I think they are talking about Bavarian pastry!

    I've been asked to develop an all composite tube for a 11" f-4.5 mirror by Waite Research. The quest is to come up with an inside diameter that allows certain equipment to fit inside without vignetting the primary yet keep the secondary as small as possible.


    No need for you to apologise for thinking out loud. I learned something from it. Please keep it up.

    Art


 

 

Similar Threads

  1. Super cheap telescope transport case
    By astronut in forum ATM DIY Telescope Making Forum
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 07-27-2010, 12:48 AM
  2. super telescope on EBAY once in a lifetime !
    By Dan Mckenna in forum Amateur Astronomy Forum
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 04-28-2006, 08:47 PM
  3. A super cheap red LED flashlight
    By Hilton Evans in forum Amateur Astronomy Forum
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 06-09-2005, 03:23 AM
  4. These cheap 6" scopes from Ebay
    By Ron in forum UK Astronomy Forum
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 02-19-2004, 06:18 PM
  5. Cheap 13 X 70 binos on ebay
    By IanYoung in forum UK Astronomy Forum
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 12-07-2003, 11:24 PM

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.2.0
Powered by vBulletin®
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:41 PM.