Results 1 to 6 of 6
  1. #1
    LethalLoki's Avatar
    LethalLoki is offline White Dwarf
    Points: 6,269, Level: 54
    Level completed: 60%, Points required for next Level: 81
    Overall activity: 0%
    Achievements:
    First 1000 Experience Points365 Days+ Registered Achievement!750 Days+ Registered Achievement!2 Posts Achievement1000 Days+ Registered Achievement!
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    Texas
    Posts
    5
    Points
    6,269
    Level
    54
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 2x 2 Posts

    Default Magnetic Relativity?



    Since it is impossible to actually contact an astrophysicist, I decided to post here. Please dont steal my idea and try to pass it off as your own =)

    Let me first start by discrediting myself... funny how often you see people do that but anyways, my knowledge on physics and astrophysics are all independant research. I havent been to college yet (but hold extremely high hopes for going soon) but I made it through highschool alive (somehow). So lets delve into this possibility I have created.

    (you can skip this paragraph if you dont really care to read)
    What really sparked this idea, and all the individual ideas before it, was thinking about Einsteins visual model he used to show general relativity. This made me think of the fact that we have easy examples of this if we stretch a flexible material out and place a round weight on it. That only works however, because we have gravity already. Several moments after I quit even thinking about it an idea sparked in my mind, as they so often do. I generally write my ideas of possibilties down in a notebook but I feel a compulsion to share this one and get some feedback hopefully.

    Imagine if you will, the dimension we live in is not a complete vacuum... the fabric of our dimension is composed primarily of nuetronic material. Above us, (for lack of any better guess as to which direction) is a positronic dimension... and below is an electronic. The nuetronic material that our ever so lovely universe is made up of is harmonious, it seeks to keep the peace or so to speak... between the positronic and electronic dimensions. In order to do this it would need to allow + and -'s attraction some leeway, so it must be flexible or else shatter.

    Going further, not only are we located in a nuetronic field but we could be resting right on top or below it. Given that mass can make impressions into this nuetronic fabric, mass (possibley anti-matter) on the opposite side can do the same. On our side, this would result in elations (hmm dark energy).

    This is where thought gets polluted with far too many ideas to post (no you havent even heard 1/12 of the actual thoughts of possibilities I put into this even from the above). Also, imagine if you will, that near the death of a star something happens, the star becomes incredibley positively charged. It is either ripped through the nuetronic material (possible there is a true-vaccum between nuetronic and charged?), or the nuetronic material stretches to its very limits. When this happens, the fabric bends to such a point that time comes to almost a complete stop. Thus making an event that should last mere miliseconds, last for nearly an infinity. Theres alot more on this that I wont go into at the moment.

    Any thoughts, comments, or opinions?
    Keep in mind, I havent studied astrophysics mathmatically... so I cannot represent any of this mathematically, nor do I know if it even could be.
    and please dont berate me for my lack of knowledge or misuse of words. Its the general idea im trying to get across.

  2. #2
    carnevali's Avatar
    carnevali is offline HYPER GIANT
    Points: 19,320, Level: 96
    Level completed: 5%, Points required for next Level: 380
    Overall activity: 0%
    Achievements:
    200+ Posts Achievement!First 1000 Experience PointsGot three Friends100+ Threads Achievement!Ghost Achievement! Averaging 5+ posts a day!
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    morehead, KY
    Posts
    2,563
    Points
    19,320
    Level
    96
    Thanks
    637
    Thanked 979x 732 Posts

    Default

    To be useful, a scientific idea must fit within the framework of what's already known (unless it shows it to be incorrect), and it must predict something new that can be tested. If your goal is to propose a new idea, you should work out the connections and propose a testable prediction.

    To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 5 or greater. You currently have 0 signatures.
    Antonino Carnevali

    To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 5 or greater. You currently have 0 signatures.
    : Zhumell Z10; SpaceWalk 18"; Celestron First
    To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 5 or greater. You currently have 0 signatures.
    (!)
    Altaz reflectors: Vixen R130SF, R150S
    Refractors: Vixen ED115S, ED80SF, A70L; SkyPod go-to mount
    Binoculars:
    To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 5 or greater. You currently have 0 signatures.
    BT70 on VersaGo

  3. #3
    timegazer24's Avatar
    timegazer24 is offline Bright Giants
    Points: 9,417, Level: 67
    Level completed: 23%, Points required for next Level: 233
    Overall activity: 0%
    Achievements:
    200+ Posts Achievement!First 1000 Experience PointsGot three Friends20+ Friends Achievement!365 Days+ Registered Achievement!
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    Arkansas
    Posts
    489
    Points
    9,417
    Level
    67
    Thanks
    393
    Thanked 106x 85 Posts

    Default

    Yes i agree with carnevali. Its kinda hard to let go of a theory thats been tested and proven(to an extent) and believe in an idea someone had without any kind of proof!!... it was an interesting concept though (which i think is why you posted , to get feedback on the concept not the theory because thats all it is right now is a new concept!!), so i think stick with it, learn the math to back you up, and give us a ring in 30-40 years!!

  4. #4
    Jez Smith's Avatar
    Jez Smith is offline White Dwarf
    Points: 6,259, Level: 54
    Level completed: 55%, Points required for next Level: 91
    Overall activity: 0%
    Achievements:
    First 1000 Experience Points365 Days+ Registered Achievement!750 Days+ Registered Achievement!2 Posts Achievement1000 Days+ Registered Achievement!
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    Birmingham
    Posts
    5
    Points
    6,259
    Level
    54
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 5x 4 Posts

    Default

    sadly it is very difficult if not impossible to make speculations about astrophysics without some testable theory and to generate a testable theory you have to understand something about how our current understanding of the universe arose, and you cannot do that without understanding the mathematics behind the theory and you cannot do that without many years of study.You have got to expect your ideas to be pulled to peices without some formal framework to back them up.Don't give up though because its through people questioning the status quo that we make progress in our understanding.

  5. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Jez Smith For This Useful Post:

    greeny (05-21-2010),timegazer24 (05-21-2010)

  6. #5
    LethalLoki's Avatar
    LethalLoki is offline White Dwarf
    Points: 6,269, Level: 54
    Level completed: 60%, Points required for next Level: 81
    Overall activity: 0%
    Achievements:
    First 1000 Experience Points365 Days+ Registered Achievement!750 Days+ Registered Achievement!2 Posts Achievement1000 Days+ Registered Achievement!
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    Texas
    Posts
    5
    Points
    6,269
    Level
    54
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 2x 2 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Jez Smith View Post
    sadly it is very difficult if not impossible to make speculations about astrophysics without some testable theory and to generate a testable theory you have to understand something about how our current understanding of the universe arose, and you cannot do that without understanding the mathematics behind the theory and you cannot do that without many years of study.You have got to expect your ideas to be pulled to peices without some formal framework to back them up.Don't give up though because its through people questioning the status quo that we make progress in our understanding.
    Yes, I know I just wanted to get some feedback on the idea, as I feel like a really big part of the concept is missing. Anyways, I plan on going to college to learn the material I need to know to prove my wacky ideas. This is just one of my ideas that lays a framework for much larger scale concepts (its my personal opinion that many "theories of everything" will emerge that are possible, favorites can be chosen but I don't believe we will have the technological equipment to prove any of them beyond a shadow of a doubt for a long time) . I try to be as thorough as possible when dreaming up my concepts, but when you don't know the specifics of the subject you are exploring, the concepts become polluted with possibilities... so its impossible for me to get it all down but I try and keep an accurate notebook on my thoughts for reference in the future. Thanks for your time spent reading, and the input I have received.

  7. #6
    carnevali's Avatar
    carnevali is offline HYPER GIANT
    Points: 19,320, Level: 96
    Level completed: 5%, Points required for next Level: 380
    Overall activity: 0%
    Achievements:
    200+ Posts Achievement!First 1000 Experience PointsGot three Friends100+ Threads Achievement!Ghost Achievement! Averaging 5+ posts a day!
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    morehead, KY
    Posts
    2,563
    Points
    19,320
    Level
    96
    Thanks
    637
    Thanked 979x 732 Posts

    Default

    Keeping a notebook for the development of your ideas is itself an excellent idea!
    Remember though that science only has two speeds: slow and .... stop. So don't feel bad if some times you'll feel you're only making slow progress.

    To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 5 or greater. You currently have 0 signatures.
    Antonino Carnevali

    To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 5 or greater. You currently have 0 signatures.
    : Zhumell Z10; SpaceWalk 18"; Celestron First
    To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 5 or greater. You currently have 0 signatures.
    (!)
    Altaz reflectors: Vixen R130SF, R150S
    Refractors: Vixen ED115S, ED80SF, A70L; SkyPod go-to mount
    Binoculars:
    To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 5 or greater. You currently have 0 signatures.
    BT70 on VersaGo

 

 

Similar Threads

  1. Relativity
    By richard3009 in forum Astrophysics Forum
    Replies: 14
    Last Post: 12-20-2009, 08:38 PM
  2. Relativity and age of universe
    By anteperkovic@vip.hr in forum Amateur Astronomy Forum
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 04-22-2005, 03:34 PM
  3. Relativity shows....
    By geraldkelleher@hotmail.com in forum UK Astronomy Forum
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: 02-28-2005, 12:21 PM
  4. Relativity
    By entity in forum General Astronomy Forum
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: 08-11-2004, 04:24 AM
  5. Relativity FAQ
    By Nathan Jones in forum General Astronomy Forum
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 12-09-2003, 11:17 AM

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.2.0
Powered by vBulletin®
All times are GMT. The time now is 11:25 AM.