Results 1 to 5 of 5
Like Tree17Likes
  • 10 Post By not_Fritz_Argelander
  • 4 Post By ProfEclipse
  • 3 Post By Gabby76

Thread: a nightmare scenario for the IAU planet definition

  1. #1
    not_Fritz_Argelander's Avatar
    not_Fritz_Argelander is offline HYPER GIANT
    Points: 167,470, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 99.7%
    Achievements:
    365 Days+ Registered Achievement!2 Posts Achievement20 Posts Achievement!750 Days+ Registered Achievement!First 1000 Experience Points
    Awards:
    Thread Award
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Location
    US
    Posts
    20,406
    Points
    167,470
    Level
    100
    Thanks
    7,052
    Thanked 43,496x 13,988 Posts
    Blog Entries
    50

    Wink a nightmare scenario for the IAU planet definition



    Scopes: Refractors: Orion ST80 (mods for white light solar), SV ED80 f7 Newtonians: Z12 f5 Catadioptrics: VMC110L, Intes MK66 EPs: KK Fujiyama Orthoscopics, 2x Vixen NPLs (40-6mm) and BCOs, Baader Mark IV zooms, TV Panoptics, Delos, Mixed branded Masuyama/Astroplans Mounts: Star Seeker III, Vixen Porta II, Celestron CG5, Orion Sirius EQG

  2. The Following 7 Users Say Thank You to not_Fritz_Argelander For This Useful Post:

    bladekeeper (07-05-2017),Gabby76 (07-05-2017),helicon64 (07-06-2017),Mark Moyer (07-05-2017),michael131313 (07-07-2017),pikaia (07-06-2017),ProfEclipse (07-05-2017)

  3. #2
    ProfEclipse's Avatar
    ProfEclipse is offline HYPER GIANT
    Points: 8,486, Level: 64
    Level completed: 12%, Points required for next Level: 264
    Overall activity: 0%
    Achievements:
    2 Posts Achievement20 Posts Achievement!50 Posts Achievement!200+ Posts Achievement!400+ Posts Achievement
    Join Date
    Feb 2017
    Location
    Apopka, FL
    Posts
    1,507
    Points
    8,486
    Level
    64
    Thanks
    1,719
    Thanked 379x 347 Posts

    Default Re: a nightmare scenario for the IAU planet definition

    Serves them right for demoting Pluto.
    Dave Hunt

    To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 5 or greater. You currently have 0 signatures.
    : Celestron C6-N
    Mount: Celestron AVX
    Camera: ASI1600MM-cool,SSAG,Canon 1100D (T3)

    To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 5 or greater. You currently have 0 signatures.

  4. #3
    Gabby76's Avatar
    Gabby76 is offline Super Moderator
    Points: 73,064, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 99.9%
    Achievements:
    2 Posts Achievement20 Posts Achievement!Gallery Achievement!Album Achievement!50 Posts Achievement!
    Awards:
    Hyperactive Geek - Silver 2rst place for Activity!
    Join Date
    Jan 2016
    Location
    Live: Slovakia Work: Canada
    Posts
    16,999
    Points
    73,064
    Level
    100
    Thanks
    2,861
    Thanked 5,318x 4,495 Posts
    Blog Entries
    4

    Default Re: a nightmare scenario for the IAU planet definition

    Poor Mr. Beelzebrown, first his "hypothetical Planet X" takes a hit and now this. Beautiful!
    Refractors: Antares 105 f/15, Bresser 102XL f/13.2, Celestron 102 f/6.5, 2-150 f/8, Stellarvue NHNG 80 f/6.9, TAL 100RS f/10, TS 102 f/11, Vixen SD115s f/7.7
    Mounts: Manfrotto 028B/ 055PRO, Celestron SLT, Celestron CG-5/ Argo Navis, Stellarvue M2C, Vixen SXP Binoculars: Celestron Eyepieces: A-Z

    To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 5 or greater. You currently have 0 signatures.

    The weakest link in the optical chain is the large nut located directly behind the
    To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 5 or greater. You currently have 0 signatures.
    / camera. - Gabrielle

    Ya gotta keep this Apo/
    To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 5 or greater. You currently have 0 signatures.
    thing in some balance of perspective. Apos are awesome, but long focus Achros aren't that far behind them - Siriusandthepup (CN)

    Refractors kick arse precisely because they don't hide behind excuses. That is, they have no obstructions to hide behind.

    To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 5 or greater. You currently have 0 signatures.

  5. #4
    ThinkerX's Avatar
    ThinkerX is offline Bright Giants
    Points: 7,702, Level: 61
    Level completed: 51%, Points required for next Level: 148
    Overall activity: 0%
    Achievements:
    2 Posts Achievement3 Years + Achievement1000 Days+ Registered Achievement!750 Days+ Registered Achievement!365 Days+ Registered Achievement!
    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Location
    Alaska
    Posts
    539
    Points
    7,702
    Level
    61
    Thanks
    23
    Thanked 982x 388 Posts

    Default Re: a nightmare scenario for the IAU planet definition

    Hmmm...perhaps that alphabetical size classification scheme I posted here ages would be better than IAU's definitions...

  6. #5
    not_Fritz_Argelander's Avatar
    not_Fritz_Argelander is offline HYPER GIANT
    Points: 167,470, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 99.7%
    Achievements:
    365 Days+ Registered Achievement!2 Posts Achievement20 Posts Achievement!750 Days+ Registered Achievement!First 1000 Experience Points
    Awards:
    Thread Award
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Location
    US
    Posts
    20,406
    Points
    167,470
    Level
    100
    Thanks
    7,052
    Thanked 43,496x 13,988 Posts
    Blog Entries
    50

    Default Re: a nightmare scenario for the IAU planet definition

    Quote Originally Posted by ThinkerX View Post
    Hmmm...perhaps that alphabetical size classification scheme I posted here ages would be better than IAU's definitions...
    Size has the same disadvantages as "orbiting a star" and "clearing its orbit". It's only geometric and not based on intrinsic physical properties.

    Here's a better definition described
    https://phys.org/news/2017-02-geophy...efinition.html
    Scopes: Refractors: Orion ST80 (mods for white light solar), SV ED80 f7 Newtonians: Z12 f5 Catadioptrics: VMC110L, Intes MK66 EPs: KK Fujiyama Orthoscopics, 2x Vixen NPLs (40-6mm) and BCOs, Baader Mark IV zooms, TV Panoptics, Delos, Mixed branded Masuyama/Astroplans Mounts: Star Seeker III, Vixen Porta II, Celestron CG5, Orion Sirius EQG

 

 

Similar Threads

  1. Why I am satisfied with the new IAU definition of planet
    By Greg Crinklaw in forum Amateur Astronomy Forum
    Replies: 26
    Last Post: 09-10-2006, 11:15 PM
  2. IAU's new planet definition
    By JackPeters in forum Amateur Astronomy Forum
    Replies: 12
    Last Post: 09-05-2006, 04:27 PM
  3. Planet Definition Questions
    By Richard Jarnagin in forum Amateur Astronomy Forum
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 08-26-2006, 11:50 PM
  4. Definition of a planet
    By steve in forum Amateur Astronomy Forum
    Replies: 151
    Last Post: 07-02-2006, 04:36 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.2.0
Powered by vBulletin®
All times are GMT. The time now is 12:27 PM.