Re: How do you get the red out..?
Not really. Since the process to correct the white balance takes place during the debayering process all the detail should remain. Keep in mind what you are correcting is the "over correction" for the red channel. The problem with a un-modified camera is that is can't capture near enough red in the first place.
I'm sure buried deep in the setup for DSS there is a setting for a modified camera, I just don't use it so can't really say for sure.
The problem with correcting 'after the fact' is all of the detail is in place and somethings are going to be adjusted that could reduce the details you want to keep. That's why it's better to have the process take place earlier rather than later.
edit: Looks like Keith got his post in before mine! Thanks for the info Keith, I was sure DSS had a way to adjust for it!
Last edited by ghswen; 06-16-2012 at 08:51 PM.
Gordon
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 5 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
Scopes: Skywatcher 254N, Orion Atlas EQ-g mount, 9x50 finder/guide scope w/SSAG. GSO coma corrector, Meade ETX70AT. Vixen 70mm refrator. Lunt LS35THa solar scope. Skywatcher EQ5pro mount. Imagers: Canon 350d (modified), Meade DSI IIc, Meade LPI, Eyepieces: a few, Primary software: Cartes du Ciel, EQMOD, Nebulosity, Photoshop, StarTools V1.3
Blog:
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 5 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 5 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
******************************
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 5 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
******************************