Well, Saturn will appear something like this:
Capture12345.JPG
I'm not sure about "Saturno". If it's a planet in another solar system you'd have to use something like Hubble to observe it . . .
Dear new friends,
I am totally new to astronomy and telescope, i have this simple and probably stupid question. If I use a Mak 127 at 200x what is the dimension of Saturno I shall see ? Shall it be like a pea (5mm diameter) or like a 1 cent? I am talking about the planet without the rings.
Sorry for the stupid question.
Good day to everybody.
Well, Saturn will appear something like this:
Capture12345.JPG
I'm not sure about "Saturno". If it's a planet in another solar system you'd have to use something like Hubble to observe it . . .
Meade ETX-80 - Meade LXD55 - Orion ST-80T - 3 cheap 10x50 Binos
Canon 20D with 50mm f1.8 lens - Logitech C250 webcam
Armed with eyepieces, filters, and a HTC Flyer
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 5 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
--- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- ---
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 5 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
My Photostream:
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 5 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
style="font-family: Verdana">1mage/
I've observed 40 Messier objects, 2 IC objects and 6 NGC objects
ezio49 is from Italy. Saturn is not spelled the same in all languages.
And sorry, I cannot get you an exact answer. But it will appear quite small.
And with a 127mm telescope you may find that you frequently cannot use more than about 125x.
In this area lately the skies have been clear more than 90% of the time for several weeks - but it's been hazy and I've just not been able to use the higher magnifications no matter how big a telescope I've been using.
Orion XX12G and XT8; 10 inch LX200GPS; ETX-125PE; ETX-80 BB; Celestron NexStar 8SE
Saturno is the roman name of the planet named Kronos by the greeks several centuries ago. Saturn in english.
Thanks to Celestron for the attached picture. If I could really see Saturn with the dimension of your picture a shall be happy, but it seems too much.
I am thinking to buy a Celestrom Nexstar 127 SLT (Mak). Have you any experience about this instrument?
I have no experience with that scope. I do have the ETX-125 which has similar optics. The Mak-Cass tends to be very good on the brighter planets.
The best thing to do, however, is to go to star parties and see if someone there has a similar scope through which you can look. That is the best way to determine which scope you like and will serve your purposes.
And yes, I know that not all of us have access to star parties. That is unfortunate.
Orion XX12G and XT8; 10 inch LX200GPS; ETX-125PE; ETX-80 BB; Celestron NexStar 8SE
Telescope:Equinox ED80 Pro (Schott/Ohara Fluorite) with Baader Steeltrack + Nexstar 6SE OTA
Mount: Skywatcher HEQ5 Pro+EQDIR + ADM bling Camera: JTW 1100D Ultimate V3, Astronomik Clip filters, Samsung SCB-4000, IS DBK21AU618.AS
Accessories: Baader 8-24 MkIII, Ortho 5mm, Aspheric 31mm, Meade 12mm reticule, Televue Powermate 2.5x, BAST Motorfocus+FCUSB, Skywatcher Field Flattener, Orion RACI, Orion Mag Mini/SSAG, Canon IS 15x50 Bins
Software: EQMOD/Stellarium/Registax/BackyardEOS/PixInsight,PHD,AlignMaster, AstroTortilla
I think you are having fun with us. . . But oh, well.
In this context, 17" should mean 17 arc-seconds.
And the comparison is to the apparent size of the Moon as viewed with the unaided eye.
Orion XX12G and XT8; 10 inch LX200GPS; ETX-125PE; ETX-80 BB; Celestron NexStar 8SE