Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 22
  1. #1
    nytecam's Avatar
    nytecam Guest

    Default Coronado PST review




    I've posted at

    http://home.freeuk.com/m.gavin/pstrev.htm

    a review of my Coronado PST which may be of interest to sola
    observers. Certainly it's the most rewarding little scope I've eve
    owned ;-)

    Nyteca

    --
    nytecam

  2. #2
    Mean Mr Mustard's Avatar
    Mean Mr Mustard Guest

  3. #3
    Phil Wheeler's Avatar
    Phil Wheeler Guest

    Default Coronado PST review

    nytecam wrote:

    I surely do agree. And the photos from your PST are the best such that
    I've seen.

    Phil

  4. #4
    RAMangold@aol.com's Avatar
    RAMangold@aol.com Guest

    Default Coronado PST review

    Maurice,

    Your pictures of the Sun with your PST are truly stunning, and your
    review was helpful. I'm close to buying the little scope, but I would
    be using it solely for visual use. Are the proms, etc., easily seen at
    the eyepiece? I know that photographs show so much more than our eyes
    can see.....simply put, is it worth buying just for visual use?

    Rick


  5. #5
    Phil Wheeler's Avatar
    Phil Wheeler Guest

    Default Coronado PST review

    RAMangold@aol.com wrote:

    Simply answered: YES

    Actually the PST is not intended by Coronado for photo use. I've seen
    other photos done with it, but those of Maurice are far and away the
    best. I've only done visual and it is great.

    Phil

  6. #6
    RAMangold@aol.com's Avatar
    RAMangold@aol.com Guest

    Default Coronado PST review

    Thanks Phil!


  7. #7
    Brian Tung's Avatar
    Brian Tung Guest

    Default Coronado PST review

    Rick wrote:

    In this case, I'd say that you can see pretty much everything that
    Maurice's images show. He shoots mostly prominences (as far as I can
    tell, anyway), and that is where the PST really shines--especially on
    a bang-for-the-buck basis. In practice, the difference between the
    PST and the MS40 (or SM40 filter) on prominences is nil. There is a
    noticeable difference with surface detail, but that too can be seen
    visually through the PST. It's less contrasty than the MS40/SM40, but
    it also costs a heck of a lot less. With image processing, I've seen
    some pretty decent shots of the surface through the PST.

    Let me put it this way--I don't regret my SM40 purchase one bit, but
    if I were entering the H-alpha scene now, I'd give serious thought to
    the PST.

    --
    Brian Tung <brian@isi.edu>
    The Astronomy Corner at http://astro.isi.edu/
    Unofficial C5+ Home Page at http://astro.isi.edu/c5plus/
    The PleiadAtlas Home Page at http://astro.isi.edu/pleiadatlas/
    My Own Personal FAQ (SAA) at http://astro.isi.edu/reference/faq.txt

  8. #8
    Phil's Avatar
    Phil Guest

    Default Coronado PST review

    Maurice your site is a regular drop in for me, great site keep it up, great
    photography.

    The PST may not have been designed for photography but with a little bit of
    a learning curve it is surprising what can be achieved. I have just had one
    of my early shots printed in Australian Sky and Telescope, but the shots I
    am getting now that I have had a fair bit of practice make that one look
    lame. It is a real buzz sometimes with the details in the photo's when the
    seeing is right. I am going to have to put together a web site soon with
    some of my shots. I just today posed a few of my older shots on alt.
    binaries.pictures.astro, have to find the time to process the latest.

    The PST is a magical little scope and now darn it they are releasing CaK
    PST, time to buy a new telescope :-)

    ..

    Phil

    "Phil Wheeler" <w6tuh-ng4@yahoo.com> wrote in message
    news:lQPaf.3654$Jo3.3306@tornado.socal.rr.com...



  9. #9
    Phil Wheeler's Avatar
    Phil Wheeler Guest

    Default Coronado PST review

    Please post the url of you photos when you get the website up. Also
    info on how you are getting the shots.

    I'd like to see Maurice's set up, too.

    My attempts at PST photos have not yet been good -- and I have six
    cameras, from P&S to EOS 20D (so it's not lack of equipment, just lack,
    of know-how or perhaps adapters).

    Phil

    Phil wrote:

  10. #10
    RAMangold@aol.com's Avatar
    RAMangold@aol.com Guest

    Default Coronado PST review

    Phil,

    You mentioned the PST CaK, what is it? I went to Coronado's website,
    and while it is listed as a product, I couldn't find any info on
    it......or couldn't get to the info if it's there.

    Thanks, Rick


 

 
Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. Coronado is gone...
    By RMOLLISE in forum Amateur Astronomy Forum
    Replies: 28
    Last Post: 08-07-2006, 07:15 PM
  2. Coronado PST review in Feb. S & T
    By RichA in forum Amateur Astronomy Forum
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 01-04-2005, 08:18 PM
  3. New Coronado PST
    By Doink in forum Amateur Astronomy Forum
    Replies: 36
    Last Post: 07-17-2004, 04:20 AM
  4. Replies: 5
    Last Post: 11-17-2003, 02:28 PM

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.2.0
Powered by vBulletin®
All times are GMT. The time now is 11:04 PM.